Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Pro-Obama and Pro-Wright All the Time
American Thinker ^ | March 19, 2008 | Peter Barry Chowka

Posted on 03/19/2008 10:27:12 AM PDT by Orwells Ghost

CNN fully lived up to its reputation as left of center Tuesday, on a day when Sen. Barack Obama was desperately trying to put the Rev. Jeremiah Wright scandal behind him. In particular, the cable news channel's three programs in prime time seemed to have their guests selected and their scripts written by Sen. Obama's campaign. Fortunately, CNN puts transcripts of its shows online, so interested parties who missed the broadcasts live can still study these endless case histories in liberal bias...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; barackobama; cnn; cnnbias; jeremiahwright; mediabias; nobama; obama; partisanmedia; timelieswarnerturner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: GalaxieFiveHundred

How true.


21 posted on 03/19/2008 11:05:00 AM PDT by OJDIDIT2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I’ve read the Beatitudes and Gospel of Jesus. I find very little in common with the venom spewed by Wright. I am offended that an ostensible member of the clergy (Holness) would pervert the teachings of my Lord and Savior to attempt to square them with the utterances of Wright.

I ask myself, if he were in attendance at Wright’s Church of What’s Happenin’ Now:

What Would Jesus Do?


22 posted on 03/19/2008 11:06:47 AM PDT by henkster (Go to the local welfare office or BMV to see what government health care will be like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Orwells Ghost

“But I think it did an enormous amount of good for him [Obama] in suburban communities among better educated.”

If you don’t vote Obama not only are you racist, you are also stupid! Got it Freepers?


23 posted on 03/19/2008 11:09:33 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orwells Ghost
Hmmm. Time for another Saturday Night Live skit???
24 posted on 03/19/2008 11:10:06 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

As sickening as the comparison to Jesus is, the comparison to King is almost as bad. Compare the “I Have a Dream” Speech to one of Wright’s sermons and the difference is like the difference between the Declaration of independence and the Communist Manifesto: Black and White, if you will.


25 posted on 03/19/2008 11:16:57 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
“But I think it did an enormous amount of good for him [Obama] in suburban communities among better educated.” If you don’t vote Obama not only are you racist, you are also stupid! Got it Freepers?

No, It's all about nuance...in French accent


26 posted on 03/19/2008 11:23:44 AM PDT by frogjerk (Hope is a theological virtue, not a campaign promise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Orwells Ghost

I saw a CNN piece yesterday analyzing the speech where they pointed out that Obama had now admitted seeing the offensive sermons after denying it and asking if people would interpret this as Obama being a “closet race divider.”

That piece that I saw was pretty well balanced actually because they also talked about what a good speaker he was.


29 posted on 03/19/2008 11:44:51 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Too bad God didn’t have better aim when that tornado hit Atlanta last week.....only minor damage to CNN’s headquarters....oh well.

[off topic]

You know, even to kid around re: something like that...not so good. Conservatives are better than that. Wishing something like that is akin to "Rev" Wright stating that we got what we deserve on 9/11.

[/off topic]

30 posted on 03/19/2008 11:49:48 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (Game over man...GAME OVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Orwells Ghost
He [Wright] is not preaching hate theology. And that should be a clear statement. It's not hate theology. It is a liberation theology. When Jesus was around, they didn't respect Jesus. They were angry with him. When he spoke the beatitudes on the mountain.

Because, as we know, if Jesus were around today he would be blaming America for creating the AIDS virus.

31 posted on 03/19/2008 11:56:23 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
His "white guilt- blame everbody speech" was directed at the NY Times Editorial Board, TV News Producers, college prof and all of his fellow moonbats (blacks included). It was meant to firm up his cool aid drinking base but what he has done by condoning RACIST HATE SPEECH is woken up the sleeping monster-- the "conservative base." Also, I suspect white working folks out there and Reagan Dems now must be thinking twice about this race baiting scam artist. Boy, I really detest this Malcoln X wanabee.
32 posted on 03/19/2008 12:28:12 PM PDT by libscum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
His "white guilt- blame everbody speech" was directed at the NY Times Editorial Board, TV News Producers, college prof and all of his fellow moonbats (blacks included). It was meant to firm up his cool aid drinking base but what he has done by condoning RACIST HATE SPEECH is woken up the sleeping monster-- the "conservative base." Also, I suspect white working folks out there and Reagan Dems now must be thinking twice about this race baiting scam artist. Boy, I really detest this Malcoln X wanabee.
33 posted on 03/19/2008 12:29:11 PM PDT by libscum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Orwells Ghost
Who is surprised by this? Big Lib media exists for NOT!!! asking the tough questions. The last thing they want to do is stir up this pile of manure any more than they have to. Obama just sprayed some glossy paint on the pile, and Big Media says isn't that wonderful. No, it just looks shinier, but it smells just as bad as it did before.

What Obama said was that deep down he is not for post-racial policies. In fact he is ardently for them. His misdirection which easily fooled a gullible lib media should not fool an honest observer. Obama doesn't want to get past race, he wants to reinforce it.

34 posted on 03/19/2008 12:32:18 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
"Now, let me make it clear in the beginning, that I see this war as an unjust, evil, and futile war. I preach to you today on the war in Vietnam because my conscience leaves me with no other choice. The time has come for America to hear the truth about this tragic war. In international conflicts, the truth is hard to come by because most nations are deceived about themselves. Rationalizations and the incessant search for scapegoats are the psychological cataracts that blind us to our sins. But the day has passed for superficial patriotism. He who lives with untruth lives in spiritual slavery. Freedom is still the bonus we receive for knowing the truth. "Ye shall know the truth," says Jesus, "and the truth shall set you free." Now, I've chosen to preach about the war in Vietnam because I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality. There comes a time when silence becomes betrayal."

-MLK Jr. on Vietnam

Sounds rather "damning" to me.

From later in the same sermon:

"The only change came from America as we increased our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept, and without popular support and all the while the people read our leaflets and received regular promises of peace and democracy and land reform. Now they languish under our bombs and consider us, not their fellow Vietnamese, the real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps, where minimal social needs are rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So they go, primarily women, and children and the aged. They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the towns and see thousands of thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their mothers. We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the nation's only noncommunist revolutionary political force, the United Buddhist Church. This is a role our nation has taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolutions impossible but refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that comes from the immense profits of overseas investments. I'm convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, militarism and economic exploitation are incapable of being conquered."

Martin Luther King Jr.: "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"

35 posted on 03/19/2008 1:32:46 PM PDT by ivyleaguebrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat
Thanks for sharing, but are you quoting from the speech I mentioned?

No.

Was the "I Have A Dream" speech a model of patriotic but pointed rhetoric?

Yes.

Did Martin Luther King, flawed though he was, put his life on the line in the fight against racism?

Yes.

Was Barack Obama even willing to put his membership in a particular church on the line in order to do the right thing?

Not even close.

Now, I've chosen to preach about the war in Vietnam because I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.

Seems like MLK was damning Barack as well. As for the second section you quoted, we've got one sermon based on him being misinformed or prejudiced against the military vs. Jeremiah Wright preaching hate for forty years or so. MLK's flaw was that he placed non-violence at the top of the moral hierarchy, where it clearly doesn't belong. To list the things Wright has put on the same pedestal that don't belong there would take more time than we have.

NO SALE.

36 posted on 03/19/2008 1:47:11 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

Not off-topis, and definitely called-for.


37 posted on 03/19/2008 1:48:44 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

topis = topic


38 posted on 03/19/2008 1:49:49 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I don’t think MLK and Wright are the same at all, in intentions, rhetorical eloquence, or thematic emphasis. I only meant to suggest that they aren’t completely incomparable.


39 posted on 03/19/2008 2:02:33 PM PDT by ivyleaguebrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat

I see your point, but if you distill things to far they lose clarity. Britney Spears and Mother Teresa probably aren’t completely incomparable.


40 posted on 03/19/2008 2:10:17 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson