What say you?
Franklin was too full of himself as the wise old man to direct matters, Jefferson strong but not as influential then as he would be. Washington? It absolutely wasn't his nature to instruct others politically. Only Adams (like William Wilberforce on the slavery issue in England) could keep the political positions in front of everyone at all times.
He had a lot of faults as president: He continued to pay tribute to the Barbaries---but at the same time began building a large-scale navy to defeat them, which Jefferson got credit for. He favored England, but really didn't side with either England or France officially. The Alien and Sedition Acts were reasonable, in my view, but of course would be struck down in a democracy. Government under Adams didn't grow nearly as much as it did under TJ, even per capita.
But he also was uncompromising, even when it would be sensible and, in the long run, helpful to be conciliatory to one's enemies. Mercy and charity were not Biblical principles he had at the top of his list.