I was clearly stating the reason for the 2nd amendment is to safeguard against tyranny, backed by Jefferson's statment, not to protect bubba from enraged geese.
Jefferson is in no way supporting your statement that self-defense in the wilderness is not a reason to safeguard the right.
That statement makes no sense whatsoever and has absolutely nothing to do with my point.
Jefferson spoke about "the strongest reason". What would he have said is the second strongest reason?