[umgud]

If the 2A is in fact an individual right, did it only apply to the individuals homes? Or did it also apply to the individuals horses and other conveyances?

If the court strikes down the DC law because it is too restrictive in its requirement that firarms be disassembled, unloaded and locked in the home, then shouldn’t the citizens be able to carry guns while outside the home also?

[marktwain]

‘If the court strikes down the DC law because it is too restrictive in its requirement that firarms be disassembled, unloaded and locked in the home, then shouldn’t the citizens be able to carry guns while outside the home also?’

---

Exactly. It would be like saying you have freedom of speech only in your home. One follows the other, once the wall is breached. Two things are needed from this decision:

One, that it is an individual right.

Two, that it applies to self defense.