I was speaking to death2tyrants. It was their comment I didn't understand. Hence my comment that I did not understand their post. Your addition does not clarify anything.
hillary is a clinton, the same clinton in 92 who said they would initiate middle class tax cuts and change welfare as we know it, they did not initiate or do that, thus why should I believe she is for nuclear energy.
Okay fine. I'll just disregard anything that comes from her mouth or campaign or from her record and I'll rely on whatever you tell me--that's the ticket! /s (btw--WJC did change welfare as we knew it, with a lot of help from a Republican congress.)
Your arguements are specious, IMO, because of your hatred of McCain.
Once again--I don't "hate" McCain. I just disagree with much his platform, particularly many of the things he mentioned in this op-ed (global warming, league of democracies, bending over to get along, etc).
Seriously, Dane. We are talking about electing a president. Senator McCain wrote a long Op-ed that included a lot of important things worthy of discussion. Your efforts to change the subject are not appreciated. Would you like to discuss the subject of this thread or would you prefer to talk about Clinton? If the latter, please exit here.
And one more time, Dane--Yes, or No:
Do you support global warming regulation, taxing greenhouse gases, or a cap-and-trade program?
“I was speaking to death2tyrants. It was their comment I didn’t understand. Hence my comment that I did not understand their post. Your addition does not clarify anything. “
In that comment, I was making fun of the Democrats naive approach towards Iran’s nuclear ambitions in comparison with the hard-line approach by Mcain.
Uh, WJC had to be pulled like a screaming two year old, with Dick Morris doing the pulling, to sign the 96 welfare reform act.
Just a question, which you don't have to answer, is your first name Monica?