[Dane]

HOGWASH! Smearing Reagan to prop-up McCain is typical trollish behavior.

Uh a fact is a fact, and Reagan signed the 1967 Therapeutic Abortion Act, and just using your rhetoric against McCain, you should be damning Reagan as you are McCain.

Maybe now you may understand that such people like yourself are called "kneejerkers".

[katiedidit1]

you are so right Dane. I believe their intent is to defeat McCain and see that Hillary is our next commander in chief. IF you defend McCain...you touch a nerve but IF you agree with the hatemongers and endorse Hillary over McCain..they will purr like a cat with a mouse.

[calcowgirl]

REagan did not sign the legislation because he favored abortion--he thought he was saving lives. For you to say that he signed it because abortion was "in vogue" is disingenous. (See here and here.)

...just using your rhetoric against McCain, you should be damning Reagan as you are McCain. Maybe now you may understand that such people like yourself are called "kneejerkers".

Rhetoric? Posting quotes from McCain is rhetoric? Opposing global warming, and the international laws, bureaucracy, and taxes that will go along with it, are rhetoric? Excuse me, but I see McCain's agenda on global warming to be one of the most destructive things to hit the street in the past century. I will oppose it, and all those who support it, with all of my might.

You still haven't answered my question:

Do you support global warming regulation, taxing greenhouse gases, or a cap-and-trade program?

A simple yes or no will do.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Reagan cannot sign anymore abortion acts. McCain CAN sign global warming acts. Therefore, the criticism is focused on the LIVING John McCain.