Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: death2tyrants
In that comment, I was making fun of the Democrats naive approach towards Iran’s nuclear ambitions in comparison with the hard-line approach by Mcain.

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't even connect our nuclear power discussion to nuclear weapons. McCain has been softening his stance a lot, of late. "Bomb, bomb, Iran" has been replaced today with "There'd be a broad range of sanctions and punishments to the Iranians to help try to convince them that their activities -- particularly development of nuclear weapons -- is not a beneficial goal to seek"

Not so hard line, anymore.

106 posted on 03/18/2008 7:41:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

Sactions AND punishments? What kind of punishment is their besides sanctions? It sounds as though he is leaving a military option on the table. If you are trying to insinuate that McCain will cave to the Iranians, you need to find a better quote than that. Regardless, the other party wants talks without preconditions. There is no comparison between McCain and the dems in regards to Iran.


110 posted on 03/18/2008 7:53:10 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson