Posted on 03/18/2008 4:56:09 PM PDT by calcowgirl
I just love FR these days.. all the usual suspects show up on their white horses and tell everying else how screwed up they are..
everying=everyone
Huh, can't handle the truth, thus the ad hominems.
BTW I've been watching your sorry-a$$ed posts for a number of years and frankly, they are way past old.
Based on what?
and to answer the next question about cap and trade, etc.etc, like it or not being green is in vogue,
So... we should go along with anything that is "in vogue?" Communism was in vogue in the 40s, too.
...just like abortion was in vogue when Ronald Reagan signed a bill legalising abortion when he was Governor of California in the late 60's,
HOGWASH! Smearing Reagan to prop-up McCain is typical trollish behavior. Do some research on Reagan's abortion bill--he didn't sign it because it was "in vogue."
...instead of damning McCain maybe you should go out to your fellow voters and tell them about the global warming scam, instead of feeling good and ranting in your echo chamber.
Dane--I asked a simple question:
Do you support global warming regulation, taxing greenhouse gases, or a cap-and-trade program?
Dane, Calcowgirl is dedicated to posting anti-McCain threads. She thinks that Hillary and McCain are identical and that shows ME...she has NOT done her homework.
Maybe she is working for the Hillary campaign?
McCain has stated over and over that he supports nuclear power. It is on his site and in his speeches. What is wrong with our industrys working to develop alternative sources of energy? I personally think it is a good idea.
Again, this article screams why John McLame is NOT worthy to be President of the United States.
America, with all her warts, is the BEST ROLE MODEL THIS WORLD AS EVER SEEN.
Because he cannot even say that, because of his utmost respect to the opinions of all mankind,and mean it, as well as his utter willingness to promote global warming in ANY form, shows that he is not the person to be either the Republican nominee or the next President.
His whole trip abroad, with Lieberman and Graham at his side, is troubling. Is he conducting foreign policy? By what right? And oh, let us not forget the little fundraiser in London on Thursday. How does that fit in with CFR that McKook champions?
The evidence builds day by day of this man’s utter contempt of the conservative principles that founded and guided this country. There should be no surprise or wailing and gnashing of teeth after 1/20/09 should this charlatan become President, when his one world agenda is exposed.
The actions of the last eight years are screaming to be paid attention to. His utter disloyalty to this President, to the GOP,to conservatives, and his embrace of the Democratic agenda are all warning signals to be heeded. As we get closer to November, this will come into focus even more clearly.
That is, for those who are willing to see clearly.
Trojan horses are white? ;-)
No, I support freedom and capitalism. You must prefer the liberal fascists...Hillary or Obama.
I'm dedicated to understanding all the candidates and not just drinking koolaid that some would like to hand out. Unlike some, I like to base my opinions on fact not propaganda. Dane said Hillary did not support nuclear energy--she does.
In the future, please have the courtesy of pinging those that you are talking about.
Maybe she is working for the Hillary campaign?
Stuff it, troll.
Ollie North, Schwartzkopf, Steve Forbes, Romney and over 100 military top brass support McCain. However, IF your dem fascists...Hillary or Obama win...LOOK OUT!!!!!!
white pine?
they ran out of austrian oak. ;-)
Calcowgirl, I am no troll but you are a hatemonger when it comes to McCain. I believe from your posts you prefer Obama or Hillary.
Also, I recall you posting something you confessed you had not read? I find you to be the troll for hillary.
I have a few words for this idiot; but can’t say them on the forum.
I want defense of our country to come before some world opinion... or world government.
You seem to have overdosed on the Hillary kool aid. I have read your posts and find you have NOT researched the facts
So YOU stuff it where the sun dont shine TROLL
Uh a fact is a fact, and Reagan signed the 1967 Therapeutic Abortion Act, and just using your rhetoric against McCain, you should be damning Reagan as you are McCain.
Maybe now you may understand that such people like yourself are called "kneejerkers".
I agree especially when we the people had no hand in nominating the 3 idiots they called Presidential nominees.
How can we even begin to think of voting for people that are truly not the American peoples’ nominees?
I don’t “hate” any of the candidates—I just try to see them for what they are.
None of them will “delight” me if elected. In fact, I find them all incompetent, unqualified, and ideologically wrong.
Now, if you can’t discuss the content of the article, take a hike. You’re boring me.
Look out for what, Katie?
All three are for amnesty.With amnesty, the destruction of our society and status as a world power is assured.
All three are for cap and trade, and believe global warming is a fact. And that the US is the main culprit.
All three believe Ted Kennedy should be consulted on selections for Federal and Supreme court judges.
All three believe in limits on political speech, including yours, Constitution be damned.
All three believe we should be subordinate to the UN.
All three believe we should close down Gitmo, and bring ununifirmed combatants to American soil and give them Constitutional rights.
All three believe that waterboarding is torture, and can never be used, even if the fate of you and your family and neighbor and your entire city hang in the balance.
All three believe we should actually care about what the rest of world thinks of us, when for the last 63 years, this nation has expended trillions and trillions of dollars to fight totalitarianism, emperor worship, fascism, communism, and Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, as well as expending more money in the history of world to give disaster aid, medical care, and economic aid to less fortunate countries, as well as expending lives and treasure to free hundreds of millions of people, without any annexation of territory, confiscation of material goods, or enslavement of conquered peoples.
So, pray tell, what is it, that we must look out for?
All three believe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.