1 posted on
03/18/2008 2:19:08 PM PDT by
SmithL
Alright, where’s the Ha Ha kid?
2 posted on
03/18/2008 2:19:40 PM PDT by
SmithL
(That's my story & I'm sticking to it!)
To: SmithL
dailykos told dems to vote for romney in michigan so this could affect a lot of people
3 posted on
03/18/2008 2:22:09 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
To: SmithL
I voted for Fred Thompson. He is not longer a candidate. Am I disenfranchised now?
4 posted on
03/18/2008 2:22:22 PM PDT by
LetsRok
To: SmithL
When did signing an oath ever stop Dems from doing something?
5 posted on
03/18/2008 2:23:01 PM PDT by
Timeout
To: SmithL
So, let me get this straight. People who not only were allowed to vote, but actually did so, now are considered “banned” because they chose, of their own free will to vote in the other primary?
I must not understand the meaning of the word banned.
To: SmithL
To cast a ballot, voters would have to sign a statement that they hadn't voted in the GOP primary. What? That's an outrage. Of course they'll lie and claim they didn't vote in the first primary. First they tampered with our election, now they want to cheat and vote for Nobama. That's so typical of them anyway, the have no shame to just change the rules in the middle of the game.
7 posted on
03/18/2008 2:25:50 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
To: SmithL
A card laid is a happy card...there should be NO 'do-overs'.
Hillary should just concede now & let's get on with the McCain v. Obama race for the White House...
8 posted on
03/18/2008 2:26:38 PM PDT by
O Neill
(Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
To: SmithL
To cast a ballot, voters would have to sign a statement that they hadn't voted in the GOP primary.How much weight does this statement hold in a court of law, if this is a Democratic Party run primary? A person can lie on this statement and not face any legal repercussions, couldn't they?
9 posted on
03/18/2008 2:39:01 PM PDT by
Azzurri
To: SmithL
So, what you’re telling me is that all the Dems (who were up in arms two weeks ago over Republicans crossing over and voting for Hillary) forgot to look in the mirror first?
Say it isn’t so.
10 posted on
03/18/2008 2:41:59 PM PDT by
Tex Pete
To: SmithL
"These people that chose to vote in that Republican primary in January did so after being told by the DNC that the Democratic primary did not count. They weren't told that if they participated in a Republican primary they wouldn't be eligible to participate in a re-do that was going to happen in June," the Obama supporter said. How could anyone be told of a "re-do that was going to happen in June" at the time of the first vote?
-PJ
15 posted on
03/18/2008 3:05:20 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson