Posted on 03/18/2008 9:34:05 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim
Did he only have one arm????
“So, do you plan to give the presumption of innocence to this cop, until more evidence surfaces?”
No, he shot two people while he was off duty. Barring a boatload of supporting witnesses he should be treated like anyone else and put in jail while they investigate. As far as we know he’s a loose cannon and a danger to society. Remember, he SHOT TWO PEOPLE and there is no dispute to that fact.
“I just don’t like prejudging anyone on such flimsy evidence.”
Cops are more than happy to prejudge everyone else. If you shoot someone in self defense you are quite likely to be arrested, jailed, and charged.
“Did he only have one arm????”
No but he looked kinda like Murtha.
Having read this thread up to your post, I keep asking myself - what did the 8-yo do, that the nice policeman though it necessary to shoot him?
“Having read this thread up to your post, I keep asking myself - what did the 8-yo do, that the nice policeman though it necessary to shoot him?”
Cmon Gen. Patton, he was probably was just claiming to be shell shocked.
/sadly sarc
Not a General in this room - I KNOW who my parents are.
;)
Precisely, the assumption of innocence ended when he turned on his blinker and followed this woman into the parking lot. He had so many way points on his decision making path to turn around and avert this situation.
When he put on his blinker.
When he followed her into the parking lot.
When he parked his car.
When he turned off the ignition.
When he pulled the keys out of the ignition.
When he opened his car door.
When he walked towards her car.
He had more than a half dozen points along this linear line that ended with two people seriously shot. Had he exercised even an ounce of self-restraint during and up to the final point, we wouldn't be discussing this here today. Instead he purposefully chose to escalate the situation. He should be held accountable for his poor decision making skills.
Shot for driving while White?
I’m holding fire on this one - I tried all of the other news sources and it just one press release quoting another press release (that is what passes for news these days)
What I want to know
Who followed who into the parking lot? (Woman followed cop, or cop followed woman.
Why has the news said nothing about statements from the cops wife, who was sitting in the car?
What did the kid have to say - other than “Mommy, the nasty man is shooting at us...”?
And, ya, if the cop was in a ‘bad shoot’ he had damn well better be looking over his shoulder. Maybe not today, or even tomorrow..... but ——
As far as the polt point, I have a new snippet - sending it now. Not complete, but another tale from the universe of Joerl.
Looking forward to it. Published another 30 pages again today, more stuff that will never be seen by anybody...sigh.
I find the odds that a 20ish woman with an 8 year old child in the car would be the one chasing the cop to be infinitesimally small as to be non-existent. Stranger things have happened, but I find it much more thoroughly plausible that a man with a badge and a gun would be the one with the requisite cajones to instigate this situation.
My son, a real live Marine, has dated such a crazy woman. And I mean, crazy. Hot? Yes - and crazy sometimes as well.
A screechy, bitchy, (add your own description here) out of control woman is perfectly capable of running anyone down.
Note to self - "mom" is in her "20s" Lad is described as eight years old.
Note to self - do math
Mom became mom at 18, she is 26.
Mom became mom at 16, she is now 22.
Interesting maths, yes?
Very much so, no less for the fact that 16 + 8 = 24, not 22. :)
“Mom became mom at 18, she is 26.
Mom became mom at 16, she is now 22.”
Or Mom became Mom at 19 and is not 27, or 28, or 29. She is married after all.
First, I need to apologize because I did not make clear my just-as-strong disagreement with the “bootlicker” appellation. Name calling typically is a sign that the opponent in a debate has run out of salient arguments.
What I found offensive is the comment “Spoken like a true non-veteran.” Being a veteran generally speaks well of a man’s (or woman’s) character, but is only an indicator and is entirely fallible. The repugnant stances taken by John Murtha spring to mind as the perfect example.
While both I and my brother are veterans, our father was not. It in no way diminished him, in my opinion. The fact that my brother and I have some shared experiences that made us different from him only made us different - not better, not worse, just different.
Honestly, without the line I originally quoted from your post I wouldn’t have paid much attention to your post at all. I do not completely agree with some of your statements, but such disagreements are reasonable between reasonable people.
And there ends my own rant.
Must be needing more coffes....
Yes, married is best as a Mom. Ever better to be a grandmother is married.
Through the efforts of ARJIS and the San Diego County Law Enforcement agencies combined, all SD County LE agencies have an agreement whereas any SD County based LE agency can write speeding tickets, or any other traffic infraction tickets, outside of their specific jursidictions, within the jurisdictions of other agencies. SD County based CHP is also included when it comes to CITY streets. They already have State Highway and Unincorporated area jurisdiction as well, obviously. Sheriff's can write anywhere. PD's can write anywhere. CHP can write anywhere. As long as it's in San Diego County.
Additionally, if you are OFF-DUTY and an LE Officer and witness a traffic infraction, you can contact the local law enforcement agency and the responding officer will cut the cite, and the witnessing off-duty officer co-signs as the officer that witnessed the infraction. And that applies throughout the entire State of California. All the tickets of all the agencies in California have two officer signature lines. A SDPD Officer can be in Oceanside for whatever reason, and write tickets there if he witnesses and infraction and makes the stop. An off-duty SDPD Officer can witness an infraction in Los Angeles and if he can get the local agency to cut the cite, the SDPD Officer co-signs... then has to go back to L.A. for court which is why it's discouraged, but not prohibited, by most departments.
But does that include busting caps on a citizen
**outside of your legal jurisdiction**
while *off duty** and **out of uniform**??
Just asking....
In Alaska IIRC, the out of town cop would be in jail right now, waiting for bail hearing. But then, that's one of the reasons I enjoy living here and not there. To each his own
A man in street clothes gets out of a car and approaches a woman and her child - at 9:30 pm - in a parking lot after a road incident. That right there constitutes a threat. What would you advise one of your loved ones to do in a similar situation?
I look forward to getting the rest of the story. I know it's not unheard of for cops to misbehave, or break the law, but I refuse to convict him without hearing the whole story.
Unlike so many on this thread.
Stop with the red herring. This is an internet discussion board, not a court of law.
Ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.