Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
"That is different from not permitting them to be armed."

Geez Louise. Here you just got finished trying to convince me that arming everyone is important because their ranks will be drawn upon as needs increase.

Now you're saying, "Well, actual arming is optional". WHAT?!? How is merely "permitting" them to be armed preparing them for Militia duty .... if they choose not to arm?

"That was not a requirement of all militias."

That was in the Militia Act of 1792. I don't care if it was or was not a requirement of all militias. What's important to note is that it is assuming people don't already have the necessary arms laying around the house.

128 posted on 03/18/2008 12:39:31 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Here you just got finished trying to convince me that arming everyone is important because their ranks will be drawn upon as needs increase.

No, I did not claim that arming everyone is important. I am supporting the same idea as the founders, that every citizen has the right to bear arms and is not limited to only members of the militia.

That was in the Militia Act of 1792

The Bill of Rights was written and ratified before that. It was not a requirement at the time.

129 posted on 03/18/2008 12:44:03 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson