Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman; jveritas
Many independents will vote for Obama in the general election who won’t vote for Hillary. Many conservatives will (grudgingly) vote in the general against Hillary when they might stay home if against Obama. Hillary is easier to beat. She lacks the messiah factor and she already has a well-proven and very high hate-index.

That's what Rush and his followers think, but there is scant evidence to back it up.

Right now, polls show that McCain pulls more independents than Obama. So the idea that Hillary is easier to beat is just fantasy.

Rush might not be meaning to do this, but he going to end up getting her elected. He has underestimated the Clintons at every turn since 1992 and here he is doing it again.

22 posted on 03/17/2008 6:43:50 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

Maybe you’re right that Obummer would be easier to beat than the Beast.

Either way, I don’t think anything Rush says at this point is going to have much of an effect on the outcome inside the Treason Party Primary Process.

After all, he didn’t have much of an effect in the Republican Party. (Zero effect, actually, from what I could see.) What makes you think he’s going to have an effect now?


24 posted on 03/17/2008 9:17:37 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson