Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spanalot
You historical ignorance is incredible -- especially with the internet at you fingertip. All you need do is a Google search on "Little Boy" and the very first thing that pops up is this:

No full test of a gun-type nuclear weapon had occurred before the "Little Boy" device was dropped over Hiroshima. The only test explosion of a nuclear weapon had been of an implosion-type weapon using plutonium as its fissionable material, on July 16, 1945 at the Trinity test. There were several reasons for not testing the "Little Boy" device. Primarily, scarcity of uranium-235 compared with the relatively large amount of plutonium which, it was expected, could be produced monthly from the Hanford reactors. Additionally, the weapon design was conceptually simple enough that it was only deemed necessary to do laboratory tests with the gun-type assembly (known during the war as "tickling the dragon's tail"). Unlike the implosion design, which required very sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work without full testing.

195 posted on 03/19/2008 8:37:44 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto

Yes I know waht the official story line is...and Sherman took savanah only with the aid of supply shipes awaiting him on the coast.

You were only predictable in your bashing of Patton, but now you are boring ...enjoy the rest of the thread.


196 posted on 03/20/2008 3:59:03 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson