Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanuki
First off, why did Boeing stick to the B767 when the Air Force wanted a B777 variant? And if a B767, why the -200ER and not the more AirBus comparable -300ER, or better yet the -400ER which needed orders anyway? Why try to get the USAF to buy the low-end model?

The B777 wouldn't have been able to meet the $40B cap.

The -300/400 would have added empty weight, hence increaed MTOW with a full fuel load. That would have increased runway length.

The best hope the Big B had was the -200bitzer with the small body, big wings and hope Uncle Sugar would accept "meets mininum requirement" as reason to buy American.

34 posted on 03/15/2008 10:44:53 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (NO I don't tag sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Oztrich Boy

“The best hope the Big B had was the -200bitzer with the small body, big wings and hope Uncle Sugar would accept “meets mininum requirement” as reason to buy American.”

Absolutely correct. This enden up in the Boeing KC-767 “Frankentanker” ( http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/sundaybuzz/2004147565_sundaybuzz27.html ). A mixup of all spare 767 parts Boeing had on stock.


36 posted on 03/16/2008 2:14:20 AM PDT by buzzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson