Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFreeBird

>>If you could add to your tagline: ... and they’ll sell out our military capabilities to any foreign government.<<

I don’t like McCain at all, but in this case, as I understand it, he wanted to open the bidding to Airbus, but the Air Force made the decision. If it turns out that McCain twisted arms to get the contract for Airbus, he could be in trouble. Boeing and Airbus both claim that their aircraft are cheaper and better. The dilemma is: How to ensure that our military buys from US producers without allowing some companies to overcharge the taxpayers?

Meanwhile, our industrial base capable of supplying the military continues to decline, as the Air Force admits, and I don’t think that is good.


52 posted on 03/15/2008 7:41:49 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Meanwhile, our industrial base capable of supplying the military continues to decline, as the Air Force admits, and I don’t think that is good.

IMHO, Part of the problem we're seeing is a result of the consolidation of our defense industries. I'm not sure allowing Boeing to buy MD was such a good idea. Both Northrop and Lockheed are capable of building a tanker, and Lockheed actually has some experience there, while Northrop's larger aircraft have been limited. Of course Northrop never really had a viable commercial offering, and Grumman's larger aircraft are not large enough. Leaving just Lockheed with any experience with large commercial airframes that lend themselves to this application.

I'm all for competition, but I'm also for keeping large strategic assets "in-house" so to speak, and one of the reasons for that line of thought is that which you mentioned.

As for McCain, yea, he may have an ax to grind with Boeing, and Boeing (former MD execs IIRC) along with people in the Airforce, were responsible for that debacle. People are in jail, heavy fines have been paid, and Boeing's CEO at the time resigned in disgrace.

And there's the so far alluded to changes in the RFP for various reasons. A whisper here, a whisper there, money talks, and future funding requests for other (AF) projects can be put in doubt if certain political games are not played. Some here have expressed doubts about such things, but there is actually a lot of precedent for it when Billion dollar contracts are at stake.

The whole thing smells.

54 posted on 03/17/2008 11:15:45 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson