Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul on Eliot Spitzer: He acted badly but didn't deserve this
Politico ^ | 3/14/08 | Staff/Ron Paul

Posted on 03/15/2008 9:13:01 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last
To: pissant

bump for later....


61 posted on 03/15/2008 9:48:17 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
I dont know. There is plenty of hanky panky going on, but we in this country like to lie about it rather than be open about it.

In a recent study, 1/3 of all children born (in the USA) have a different father than the husband.... indicating that we are quite "active" already. But, by how people talk though, you'd think we were in a puritan enclave. My problem is that we have become a nation of liars and hypocrits when it comes to sex.

Americans (or maybe just people in the south were I am) can be such fakes. I get tired of some of my more "relgious" bible thumper friends talk about purity and all that... when I was just with them at a "club" the night before. I can't stand two faced behavior and that is what I'm seeing going on nowdays. Its seems to be more the rule than the exception.

At least the Europeans, who probably actually have LESS illicit sex than we do, are honest about it.
62 posted on 03/15/2008 9:49:30 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"It was unusual BANK TRANSFERS "

They weren't that unusual. He had some serious enemies that were just waiting to get him. He may well have deserved it, but the same "methods" could be used against anyone... even the innocent.
63 posted on 03/15/2008 9:50:53 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Ron get back on your meds. You’re making Kucinich appears sane for heaven’s sake.


64 posted on 03/15/2008 9:51:28 AM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Its “entrapment” if it takes place over ten years?


65 posted on 03/15/2008 9:52:44 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
I don't think it would have mattered. Bill and Hill were already working for them.

How cynical of you...LOL. I believe slick and the witch have played all the angles that benefit them politically and monetarily. Once they are no longer so powerful, someone will expose them for the criminals they are.

66 posted on 03/15/2008 9:52:55 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
If you can't stand two faced behavior, you might want look in the mirror and solve your own problems instead of putting up the strawman of the eeeevil anti-sex bible thumpers.

Try it for a while, perhaps by Memorial day you will be perfect and can then come back and work on the rest of us.

67 posted on 03/15/2008 9:52:57 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

???


68 posted on 03/15/2008 9:53:23 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Was that a personal attack? Hmmmm.... sure seemed like it.


69 posted on 03/15/2008 9:53:49 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
He may well have deserved it, but the same "methods" could be used against anyone... even the innocent.

But if the innocent did not do anything wrong they do not have anything to worry about.
70 posted on 03/15/2008 9:54:14 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
You mean you're not perfect yet?

Dang.

71 posted on 03/15/2008 9:54:55 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Objectively speaking, what Spitzer did was really not that bad

Being indicted and breaking the law is not "really that bad"? Is that what you mean?

72 posted on 03/15/2008 9:55:12 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John D

Oh really??? That’s sarcasm right? How about we all just install cameras in our houses so the feds can watch us.... well... you know... if we don’t have anything to hide.


73 posted on 03/15/2008 9:55:57 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
In either of which offices, had he caught a pol doing what he was doing (and thought for a moment it might be good for the resume), my impression is he'd have run the sucker over and not even left skidmarks).

Most assuredly, if the malfeasant was a Republican - especially a white male heterosexual professional. That's the demographic of choice for a vicious 'Rat prosecutor to target.

74 posted on 03/15/2008 9:56:02 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John D

As I understand it, Spitzer used the power of government to threaten and intimidate some innocent people. I thought Paul and the libertarians stood against that kind of government abuse.


75 posted on 03/15/2008 9:56:25 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Ron Paul is an anarchist.

An anarchist legislator. Now there's a concept to ponder.

76 posted on 03/15/2008 9:56:35 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Never said I was. Not sure how you got that from my comment. You seem a little sensitive for some odd reason. Weird attack on me there buddy.


77 posted on 03/15/2008 9:56:50 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Ron Paul: "Spitzer was brought down because he legally withdrew cash from a bank — not because he committed a crime. This should prompt us to reassess and hopefully reverse this trend of pervasive government intrusion in our private lives."

You: "Now if he wants to talk about eliminating this Orwellian law requiring banks to snitch on us when we spend our own cash, I’m listening."

Now I'm confused. That's exactly what he IS talking about, isn't it?

78 posted on 03/15/2008 9:57:05 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Sounds that way to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Once again Paul proves himself to be a lunatic whackjob.


79 posted on 03/15/2008 9:59:18 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("There is no civility, only politics.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

The banking transaction reporting laws were the result of banks gleely taking money from drug smugglers and cleaning it up for them.

Miami in particular was a mess. It was actually the killing of bystanders in the streets that put the pressure on the govt. Up until then not many were paying attn.


80 posted on 03/15/2008 9:59:25 AM PDT by blueheron2 (Half a loaf is better than none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson