Skip to comments.
Ron Paul on Eliot Spitzer: He acted badly but didn't deserve this
Politico ^
| 3/14/08
| Staff/Ron Paul
Posted on 03/15/2008 9:13:01 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 341-346 next last
To: pissant
61
posted on
03/15/2008 9:48:17 AM PDT
by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: Allegra
I dont know. There is plenty of hanky panky going on, but we in this country like to lie about it rather than be open about it.
In a recent study, 1/3 of all children born (in the USA) have a different father than the husband.... indicating that we are quite "active" already. But, by how people talk though, you'd think we were in a puritan enclave. My problem is that we have become a nation of liars and hypocrits when it comes to sex.
Americans (or maybe just people in the south were I am) can be such fakes. I get tired of some of my more "relgious" bible thumper friends talk about purity and all that... when I was just with them at a "club" the night before. I can't stand two faced behavior and that is what I'm seeing going on nowdays. Its seems to be more the rule than the exception.
At least the Europeans, who probably actually have LESS illicit sex than we do, are honest about it.
To: nmh
"It was unusual BANK TRANSFERS "
They weren't that unusual. He had some serious enemies that were just waiting to get him. He may well have deserved it, but the same "methods" could be used against anyone... even the innocent.
To: pissant
Ron get back on your meds. You’re making Kucinich appears sane for heaven’s sake.
64
posted on
03/15/2008 9:51:28 AM PDT
by
Yankee
To: pissant
Its “entrapment” if it takes place over ten years?
To: Richard Kimball
I don't think it would have mattered. Bill and Hill were already working for them.How cynical of you...LOL. I believe slick and the witch have played all the angles that benefit them politically and monetarily. Once they are no longer so powerful, someone will expose them for the criminals they are.
66
posted on
03/15/2008 9:52:55 AM PDT
by
Snardius
To: StolarStorm
If you can't stand two faced behavior, you might want look in the mirror and solve your own problems instead of putting up the strawman of the eeeevil anti-sex bible thumpers.
Try it for a while, perhaps by Memorial day you will be perfect and can then come back and work on the rest of us.
67
posted on
03/15/2008 9:52:57 AM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
To: Lakeshark
Was that a personal attack? Hmmmm.... sure seemed like it.
To: StolarStorm
He may well have deserved it, but the same "methods" could be used against anyone... even the innocent.
But if the innocent did not do anything wrong they do not have anything to worry about.
70
posted on
03/15/2008 9:54:14 AM PDT
by
John D
To: StolarStorm
You mean you're not perfect yet?
Dang.
71
posted on
03/15/2008 9:54:55 AM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: gridlock
Objectively speaking, what Spitzer did was really not that bad Being indicted and breaking the law is not "really that bad"? Is that what you mean?
To: John D
Oh really??? That’s sarcasm right? How about we all just install cameras in our houses so the feds can watch us.... well... you know... if we don’t have anything to hide.
To: RichInOC
In either of which offices, had he caught a pol doing what he was doing (and thought for a moment it might be good for the resume), my impression is he'd have run the sucker over and not even left skidmarks).Most assuredly, if the malfeasant was a Republican - especially a white male heterosexual professional. That's the demographic of choice for a vicious 'Rat prosecutor to target.
To: John D
As I understand it, Spitzer used the power of government to threaten and intimidate some innocent people. I thought Paul and the libertarians stood against that kind of government abuse.
75
posted on
03/15/2008 9:56:25 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
To: nmh
Ron Paul is an anarchist.An anarchist legislator. Now there's a concept to ponder.
76
posted on
03/15/2008 9:56:35 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Lakeshark
Never said I was. Not sure how you got that from my comment. You seem a little sensitive for some odd reason. Weird attack on me there buddy.
To: DManA
Ron Paul: "Spitzer was brought down because he legally withdrew cash from a bank not because he committed a crime. This should prompt us to reassess and hopefully reverse this trend of pervasive government intrusion in our private lives."
You: "Now if he wants to talk about eliminating this Orwellian law requiring banks to snitch on us when we spend our own cash, Im listening."
Now I'm confused. That's exactly what he IS talking about, isn't it?
78
posted on
03/15/2008 9:57:05 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Sounds that way to me.)
To: pissant
Once again Paul proves himself to be a lunatic whackjob.
79
posted on
03/15/2008 9:59:18 AM PDT
by
Emperor Palpatine
("There is no civility, only politics.")
To: DManA
The banking transaction reporting laws were the result of banks gleely taking money from drug smugglers and cleaning it up for them.
Miami in particular was a mess. It was actually the killing of bystanders in the streets that put the pressure on the govt. Up until then not many were paying attn.
80
posted on
03/15/2008 9:59:25 AM PDT
by
blueheron2
(Half a loaf is better than none.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 341-346 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson