Posted on 03/14/2008 11:30:08 AM PDT by TonyXL
NEW YORK (AP) -- Bear Stearns Cos., one of the most venerable names on Wall Street, turned to a rival bank and the federal government for a last-minute bailout Friday to prevent it from collapsing.
The Federal Reserve responded swiftly to pleas from Bear Stearns that its coffers had "significantly deteriorated" within a 24-hour period as rumors about the bank's situation fueled the Wall Street version of a run on the bank. Central bankers tapped a rarely used Depression-era provision to provide loans, and said they were ready to provide extra resources to combat an erosion of confidence in America's biggest financial institutions.
(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...
Do you think it was immoral for Countrywide CEO Mozilo to quietly cash out stock to the tune of 150 million last year, when he knew his company was on life support, while touting it as a great long buy to the sheeple, propping up its price with lies, while he secretly was abandoning ship? All just before it crashed, which he knew it was going to do?
Oh my Jason, reality seems to have struck you! Just days ago, you were laughing at us “gloomers” and our absurd notions. Now you are talking about soup lines. What happened?
Simple, really.
Every commentator on CNBC buisness news channel confirmed that today was a classic "run on the bank". Hell, the stockholder bid the stock down from about 55 to the mid-twenties ( I do not know where it closed, but it lost about half of its value).
And their collapse, while painful would be better long term for the economy.. you have to let this mess flush itself out... and you don’t do that by bailing out the idiots.
Sorry, but that’s how it works. You short circuit it, you don’t help anyone in the long run.
Ha!
Who was he touting it to? As far as secretly selling his stock, insiders have to file a report with the SEC within 2 business days of selling or buying. The SEC publishes that info on a regular basis.
Mozilo may be a scumbag, but the idea that he was secretly selling is silly. And wrong.
Everyone involved needs to understand, though, that no financial institution can withstand an immediate and sudden "discredit" by all of its customers and trading partners. One can point to various things they could have done differently to avoid that happening, but in the end it is not simply under their control. Panic can break absolutely anything. And the standing means of dealing with that threat, whether in a public or a private banking system, is the lender of last resort.
The Fed is doing its job here. That job is necessary. Deal.
Those hedge funds are the same sort as the Carlyle unit that failed just before. Notice, in that case, the fund was unable to meet margin calls, all the securities it pledged as collateral were seized by the banks they had borrowed from.
Bear was involved in the onset of the whole present credit crunch last July, when two of its funds of a similar nature failed, and it seized their collateral.
What you are seeing throughout the system is distrust of institutional counterparties. Bears' customers feared they would have assets frozen, if not seized, if they left them at Bear, and so demanded them back. Which is the "turnabout" version of what happened to the Carlyle group unit. Instead of the bank making demands of a customer and taking collateral when those couldn't be met, the customers were making demands of the bank, that it couldn't meet all at once - without help that is.
In all cases, the underlying illiquidity is driven by the same cause - securities that were thought safe and stable in price, carried at high leverage using short term borrowings. When those securities then drop in price, both sides of the transactions (holders and lenders) are under pressure, and trust and confidence evaporate.
I personally think it was highly immoral: it is both a betrayal and a lie.
Now, why would you suspect that you could be called a socialist for raising a purely ethical issue?
There is plenty of scum on Wall Street (as well as in NBA, fashions, politics, and everywhere else where there power and/or money is involved). The behavior you mentioned is pretty scummy in my book.
NO the fed isn’t doing its job, its bailing out bastards who decided that they could seperate risks from lending.. now when those risks have come home to roost, we’ve made sure the idiots who did it, get a nice payday out of the taxpayers for it.
BEARS needs to fall by the wayside and be a lesson so that others won’t repeat their mistakes.. but oh no, not in this age of gubment owned by corporate interests.
It doesn't help anybody to grind entire businesses in the dirt in a misplaced moralism. You won't be a dime richer as a result, the country as a whole will just be poorer. It is completely stupid to wish ruin on your neighbors just out of spite.
The only thing that ground their business into the dirt was their own greed and ineptitude.. and its not the responsibility of the tax payers to bail them out.
The country as a whole will not be any poorer because some mismanaged greedy lender overextended and went belly up.
They overleveraged and its come home to roost and it should take the bastards who did it with them, not force the rest of us to pay for their incompentence. Let them go by the wayside like every other mismanaged company before them. Just because they are a “bank” doesn’t mean they get some special pass and a bailout when they screw up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.