Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

“No, standing there is a deliberate action, not showing up at her husbands press conference isn’t, unless you consider she has an obligation to be there.”

You honestly believe that the issue of her marriage would be discussed less in public if she had NOT been there? Please.


55 posted on 03/14/2008 8:55:05 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: dinoparty
“No, standing there is a deliberate action, not showing up at her husbands press conference isn’t, unless you consider she has an obligation to be there.”...You honestly believe that the issue of her marriage would be discussed less in public if she had NOT been there? Please.

Of course not, as I noted they're public figures. You'll note my first comment on the thread was addressing your contension that its none of our business. He is accountable to the public, but her decisions about the marriage are private, and should be. By virtue of his position, it's a public issue, as is her reaction. Had she decided not to show that would send a message too, though it could also be misinterprited.

72 posted on 03/14/2008 10:57:14 AM PDT by SJackson (Never talk when you can nod, never nod when you can wink, never write an e-mail, E. Spitzer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: dinoparty

Probably should have added, she had no good choice here.


73 posted on 03/14/2008 10:59:22 AM PDT by SJackson (Never talk when you can nod, never nod when you can wink, never write an e-mail, E. Spitzer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson