[goldstategop]

Nothing in her appearances showed any approval of what her husband had done. You may feel obligated to show family your outward support but you don't have to feel like you're condoning their behavior. I don't imagine Slida feels at all happy with her husband's conduct. She never smiled or looked at him during his press conferences.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[SJackson]

Nothing in her appearances showed any approval of what her husband had done. You may feel obligated to show family your outward support but you don't have to feel like you're condoning their behavior. I don't imagine Slida feels at all happy with her husband's conduct. She never smiled or looked at him during his press conferences.

Not suggesting she did, I was simply addressing the propriety of her actions, or potentially lack of, as a public issue. Which it is. I haven't a clue what she does from here. And while Quinn seems to think the message is one condoning male misconduct, it can just as easily be construed as keeping private issues private, as best as you can. Realisticly though, there's also a message of standing by your man, which wouldn't be there if the genders were reversed.