Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Well, by your reasoning, she is required to make it a public issue. After all, if she had refused to stand there, then it would have been sending a strong message about the future of the marriage. I see her being there as a way to minimize the speculation.


31 posted on 03/14/2008 8:31:58 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: dinoparty
Well, by your reasoning, she is required to make it a public issue. After all, if she had refused to stand there, then it would have been sending a strong message about the future of the marriage. I see her being there as a way to minimize the speculation.

No, standing there is a deliberate action, not showing up at her husbands press conference isn't, unless you consider she has an obligation to be there.

As to it being a public issue, good grief, he's the Governor of New York with Presidential ambitions, resigning over both legal and moral misconduct. It's a public issue irrespective of what his wife does.

46 posted on 03/14/2008 8:46:43 AM PDT by SJackson (Never talk when you can nod, never nod when you can wink, never write an e-mail, E. Spitzer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson