[tobyhill]

The MSM is so hell bent on destroying this Presidents credibility even though he didn't say that Iraq had a hand in 911 just that there are links to the type of terrorist. Even the dumbest lib that reads this report could see the linkage. The people who are writing this report even try to skew the facts by claiming “it's complex”,”what you see is what you see but what you see is not really what you see”. Al-Qaeda means The Base and there are hundreds of groups that don't call themselves Al-Qaeda but are in the truest form Al-Qaeda.

[Enchante]

The dishonest MSM and lying Demagogues re-defined the level of “links” to require clear “operational links” meaning command-and-control from Baghdad. This allows the vicious liars to ignore and discount all evidence that is not of the nature of “Saddam ordered THIS terrorist attack on this date and Al Qaeda carried it out” Of course the rational person would consider ANY support or collaboration, plus the potential for FUTURE support of more terrorism, in evaluating Saddam’s relationship with terrorism.

Saddam supported many terrorists, in and out of Al Qaeda. The greatest danger for the USA was that at any moment Saddam could greatly increase future support to serve his ends, and/or could offer Al Qaeda or another group a nice chunk of funds or material support in the interest of carrying out an attack that both agreed was worth doing.

Saddam was a large existing and potential support for terrorists of many stripes, and now he is gone. That is a wonderful thing, except the Demagogues still don’t get it.