Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813

True enough. Santorum’s support of RINO Specter is most certainly what cost him the election. You wonder what these guys must be thinking.


77 posted on 03/13/2008 5:43:17 PM PDT by Noumenon (The only thing that prevents liberals from loading us all into cattle cars is the power to do it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Noumenon
Santorum’s support of RINO Specter is most certainly what cost him the election.

Pat Toomey didn't cost Santorum the election. Pennsylvania isn't nearly conservative enough for that to have made even a little bit of difference, let alone to account for the 19-point drubbing that he received.

Rick Santorum lost for two reasons:

1) Iraq. Approval for the war in PA was polling under 30% in November, 2006. The Democrats (who won everywhere, mind you) had declared the war lost. The media breathlessly proclaimed it a hopeless "sectarian civil war". Santorum didn't back down, didn't flinch. He supported the war clearly and forcefully until the very end, and he paid a big political price for it.
2) Bob Casey. Pro-life son of a great, beloved pro-life Governor. People in PA love familiarity. And pro-lifers who didn't like the war were given an easy alternative to Santorum.

You can even throw in the fact that Ed Rendell was hugely popular, and Lynn Swann turned out to be a non-existent challenger. It's not like the base -- whatever base still exists in PA -- was motived in Pennsylvania. It was a perfect storm for the Democrats. Santorum never had a chance.

80 posted on 03/13/2008 7:04:39 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson