Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 13, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

[1rudeboy]

Now your making personal attacks. Very creative.

Here's an update for you: don't dish it out if you can't take it. And don't whine about it when it happens to you after you do it.

[1rudeboy]

"Could it be FR wants to cover up the fact George Bush is trying to destroy our national sovereignty?"

Do those words ring a bell?

[Man50D]

Here's an update for you: don't dish it out if you can't take it. And don't whine about it when it happens to you after you do it.

I give you credit for at least being consistently off the mark with each post. You should heed your own advice since you can only provide vague statements and innuendos against Corsi by repeatedly whining about yellow journalism without providing any proof. Are you getting any closer to finding those sources?

[Man50D]

Do those words ring a bell?

I ask a question because it makes me wonder but clearly don't make it a statement of fact absent any proof unlike you do with your ridiculous yellow journalism whine. Thank you for proving my point!

[1rudeboy]

You implied it. Just admit it. As for Corsi yelping about the "secret" list, all I can find are references on websites (that's conspiracy websites) to World Net Daily articles he wrote before World Net Daily itself admits the list was "leaked" to it by some Canadian lefty named Mel Hurtig.

And no, I cannot link to those websites because they are forbidden on FR.

[Globalist Goon]

I understand your loyalties, I just don’t side with them. You are a big government cheerleader, and a globalist enabler.

As far as raging against the republicans, I could care less about them. It is *almost* a lost cause.

The funny part is that you are in complete denial if you think they are for small government and individual liberty. Which leads me to believe that you are either stupid or in denial.

[Man50D]

You implied it. Just admit it.

It would be very easy for me to assume you're implying that I'm a liar if it weren't for the fact I don't care. You keep telling yourself you know what I'm thinking while you keep looking for those irrefutable sources that will completely discredit Corsi. Good luck finding those sources!

[1rudeboy]

You forget one possibility. You are a total idiot.

[1rudeboy]

I’m not implying you’re a liar. Either you’ve forgotten what you’ve posted, or are running away from it.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

Enlarged United States of America.

So many comments..... wow.

[Globalist Goon]

Should we run down the list of reasons as to why you are a phony, or are you one of these new conservatives (moderate worms)? If that is the case, then go on with your little dream world.

[shadowgovernment]

A hem a well maybe you should review early AMERICAN HISTORY- This nation was built on a conspiracy against the King of England --just a thought.
But if TV personalities are your idea of deep thought it will probably miss your abilities to have an insight into major historic events.

[1rudeboy]

I don’t know, newbie, why don’t you simply get started and we’ll go from there?

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

At least up to the first 50 comments, no freeper seems to have commented that they're supposedly moving toward a transatlantic union, merging the NAFTA states and the EU into one union.

Personally would view adding all of the other states in the Americas into the United States as the option to pick over merging the NAFTA states and the EU. Latin America is much poorer, by and large, than EU states, but a country covering both continents in the Americas is more easily defensible than a country split by an ocean, especially when the more populous part (the EU) has a land border with Russia and Asia, and has Africa to the south; Muslims to the south and southeast.

In terms of illegal immigration alone, that is a pool of over 3 billion people who could theoretically walk across the border into THE NAFTA+EU Alliance. Militarily, Europe could soon be run over. Internally, Europe doesn't look so safe. As decline in pride in their countries among the citizenry combined with Muslim immigrants who refuse to assimilate doesn't bode all that great for Europe. Besides trying to keep the 'white' people together in a growing world with shifting geopolitics, unifying North America and Europe doesn't make much sense on several levels.

[Globalist Goon]

OK. Are you a McCain supporter?

[1rudeboy]

No.

[glock rocks]

I posted 201 and 202. I was merely helping our globalist FRiend with some purple formatting on the post you replied to.

Sorry you were confused.

[mo]

“That’s the argument the Democrats made about Dick Cheney’s energy policy meetings - that if the executive branch gets advice and they don’t publish that advice its a conspiracy.”

Dick Cheney’s meetings clearly dealt with American energy policy. Whether that should be conducted in private or in public was and remains a valid public policy issue. The same issues arose when Hillary Clinton felt compelled to try to nationalize health care.

The potential for public mis-understanding, the very real potential for compromise of American sovereignity for transnational corporate priorities and UN socialist imperatives, demands open, public meetings concerning these issues. Anything else , in this day and age, opens its participants to being labeled traitors. There is no room for a private agenda concerning these matters.

[1rudeboy]

Again, this meeting was open to the press, whereas Cheney’s and Clinton’s were not.

[ovrtaxt]

Sure. That’s why the WND reporter was allowed to attend the meeting and report on it . . . because it’s all a secret.

It hasn't been a secret for years- ever since Quigley, in fact. There's nothing 'secret' about any of this, you can go to any local zoning meeting in Houston and see the NAU being shoved down the throats of America.

The problem is the average American is mesmerized by Britney Spears's tabloid crotch shots instead of what's being done by the control freaks right under their noses.