Skip to comments.
Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| March 13, 2008
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 03/13/2008 4:09:15 AM PDT by Man50D
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 341-347 next last
To: processing please hold
China practices free trade? Interesting, please share.
To: 1rudeboy
And according to John Hopper, “the Hook brings you back”
To: 1rudeboy
Sorry, Popper, not Hopper
To: All
This past primary election for president, I believe there were only three republicans running who were not CFR members. Those three being Hunter, Paul and Tancredo.
Glad I personally held firm and didn't vote for a CFR-republican. Sadly, many did.
144
posted on
03/13/2008 11:40:54 AM PDT
by
NoWayMcCain
(Proud Tancredo supporter who will not be voting for McCain while still living in a 'safe state'.)
To: Calpernia
Clarify you statement to me of: And you folks wonder why there are so many skeptics... I refuse. I am not refusing because I cannot do it or because it might make me look bad. I am refusing because if you can't figure out what I meant, then you need to go take a reading class. Here's a hint: The comment was directed at Man50D.
Look, either you agree with Man50D that JimRob is a traitor or not. If you do, jump in a lake. If not, go on with your day and stop trying to find trouble.
145
posted on
03/13/2008 11:41:01 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: Calpernia
IIRC, there were about a couple of dozen stipulations that china needed to achieve before PNTR was going to be approved. Human rights being one of them.
146
posted on
03/13/2008 11:41:57 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: period end of story
Not this crap again.
Is it really???
147
posted on
03/13/2008 11:42:32 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm not worried anymore. I read Obama's "Blueprint for Change".)
To: 1rudeboy
Sources of what? Stop playing stupid.
Oh I see. It's stupid to expect you to produce the sources you claim existed. I'm still waiting for those sources!
148
posted on
03/13/2008 11:42:38 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: 1rudeboy
149
posted on
03/13/2008 11:44:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: 1rudeboy
150
posted on
03/13/2008 11:47:11 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Man50D
In the time it took you to compose your response, you could easily have requested something specific. And then I could have told you that I have it or that I don't.
So here we are. I'm looking for some historical evidence that Corsi complained about that the Banff conference participant list was "secret," and that it "proved" his conspiracy (despite the fact that I clearly remember his doing so).
What will happen when I find it? You'll complain it's not what you were looking for, despite the fact that I asked you what you were looking for in the first place.
To: 1rudeboy
I dug around(now hold your nose) in my CFR/NAU folder and found this.
CFR-China
That's why I was asking about the PNTR and condi. They didn't meet their obligations yet it was taken off the table I believe. I'm still looking around.
152
posted on
03/13/2008 11:54:33 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: shadowgovernment
I have discovered that there are more than several FReepers that take considerable efforts to discredit the reality of the NWO.
Thats fine....5-10 years from now, I will take sad pleasure in telling them “I told You so”.
153
posted on
03/13/2008 11:55:58 AM PDT
by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I wish Corsi was still a FReeper, we could ask him.
To: Halgr
5-10 years? I hope you’ll still be here so I can rub that comment in your face.
To: Mr. Silverback
Look, either you agree with Man50D that JimRob is a traitor or not.
Get you facts straight. I never referred to anyone as a traitor. I asked a question because there was no valid reason to move this thread to Bloggers and Personal as it met the definition of News/Activism.
156
posted on
03/13/2008 12:31:23 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Man50D
>>WND observed about 25 ACIEP members, including U.S. corporations involved in international trade, prominent U.S. business trade groups, law firms involved with international business law, international investment firms and other international trade consultants.<<
I would guess this was preparatory meeting for the meeting in July ACIEP has held for last 10 years (at least) where an assistant Secretary of State thanks the ACIEP for making the nominations for the Secretary of States Award for Corporate Excellence (ACE) and to update the ACIEP members on economic developments like G-8 and World Economic summit. That meeting is usually in July.
And then in October or November they have the actual ACE awards where the Secretary of state shows up.
It makes me wonder did WND know all this and not publish it or do they know even less about the ACIEP’s schedule than I do? I’m guessing they knew if they were able to identify that many ACIEP members by sight - I couldn’t do that. Although it seems like they would have identified the corporations.
157
posted on
03/13/2008 12:36:05 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: wolfcreek
“The reason people deny the facts is because they feel powerless to do anything about it.”
It’s the same few freepers every time. IMO, they aren’t in denial at all. They are OBL, CFR-supporting globalists following the playbook.... to limit any conversation on the subject.
To: 1rudeboy
In the time it took you to compose your response, you could easily have requested something specific. And then I could have told you that I have it or that I don't.
I have been requesting something specific all along! They are called sources! If you don't have any sources to backup your original claim in your post #23 I think more people would take the threat more seriously if it wasnt yellow journalism then why didn't you say so several posts ago?
So here we are. I'm looking for some historical evidence that Corsi complained about that the Banff conference participant list was "secret," and that it "proved" his conspiracy (despite the fact that I clearly remember his doing so).
No, here you are accusing Corsi of yellow journalism but unable to substantiate your claim with any "specific" and credible information.
What will happen when I find it? You'll complain it's not what you were looking for, despite the fact that I asked you what you were looking for in the first place.
You're presuming to know what I'm thinking illustrates your pathetic attempt to counter Corsi's reports with vague and general statements devoid of any credible evidence to the contrary.
I think more people would take the threat more seriously if it wasnt yellow journalism.
I know I would take your vacuous and disparaging claim seriously if you had any sources to buttress your false statements.
I'll ask once again since you pretend not to understand my past questions. What are your specific resources to refute Corsi's report?
159
posted on
03/13/2008 12:52:41 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Man50D
“A largely unreported meeting held at the State Department discussed integration of the U.S., Mexico and Canada in concert with a move toward a transatlantic union, linking a North American community with the European Union.
The meeting was held Monday under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, or ACIEP. WND obtained press credentials and attended as an observer. The meeting was held under “Chatham House” rules that prohibit reporters from attributing specific comments to individual participants. “
Is this not a violation of the Federal “Sunshine Laws”?!!
160
posted on
03/13/2008 12:54:57 PM PDT
by
mo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 341-347 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson