Skip to comments.
In Congress, the Uphill Battle for Gun Control
U.S. News & World Report ^
| March 6, 2008
| Emma Schwartz
Posted on 03/13/2008 1:42:32 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
This is biased and problematic, to say the least.
1
posted on
03/13/2008 1:42:34 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I love how details are only provided when it benefits the author and blanket denials where it might prove the author wrong. Standard dinosaur media tactics.
2
posted on
03/13/2008 1:56:49 AM PDT
by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: neverdem
Only a lib would say that there was a “25% drop in gun crime” in one paragraph and a “7% increase” in the next. I would sure like to see the study from ‘91 she quotes. I bet it is more FOS than the “43 times more likely” crap we saw in the last run on guns.
3
posted on
03/13/2008 1:59:09 AM PDT
by
wastoute
To: neverdem
This is biased and problematic, to say the least.You can say that again.
If the gun ban is struck down, the District will very likely see an increase in firearms ownership and perhaps a rise in burglaries by criminals trying to obtain guns.
I love this line. "If we make it legal to own guns, criminals will commit MORE crimes in order to obtain things ILLEGALLY that they can already obtain ILLEGALLY." The illogic makes my head spin.
To: neverdem
they will never understand that the 2nd amendment is not even about crime, it is about insurance to prevent the govt from stuff like this:
5
posted on
03/13/2008 2:03:13 AM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
To: neverdem
“This is biased and problematic, to say the least.”
Since when has the lamestream media written an article on guns that wasn’t?
6
posted on
03/13/2008 2:04:21 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
To: neverdem
MOLON LABE!
7
posted on
03/13/2008 2:14:58 AM PDT
by
JDoutrider
(No 2nd Amendment... Know Tyranny)
To: neverdem
"Every day about two dozen officers fan out across the city's roughest blackest neighborhoods, stopping drivers and pedestrians for traffic and other offenses and executing warrants in search of illegal guns."But even a rumor of censorship and the MSM cries, "FREE SPEECH!" and "FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS!"
8
posted on
03/13/2008 2:15:18 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: neverdem
I especially loved the fact that researchers compared D.C. to “prosperous suburbs”. I nearly fell out of my chair laughing! Jeez, D.C. would look violent and crime ridden even if it were compared to the Battle of the Bulge!
To: endthematrix
D.C.’s gun ban is based on race.
Enacted to keep blacks unarmed.
10
posted on
03/13/2008 2:35:16 AM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: neverdem
... "We have more than 250 million guns in this country, and not all of those guns are in the hands of rational people," ...
We have several million elected officials in the United States.
Just how many of them are rational?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
11
posted on
03/13/2008 2:44:08 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
To: neverdem
In Congress, the Uphill Battle for Gun Control Made even more difficult by the passing of that Brady Bill gonif Howard Metzenbomb. (:^*)
12
posted on
03/13/2008 3:08:10 AM PDT
by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
To: neverdem
a study published five years later argued that the assessment wasn't valid because it compared D.C. with prosperous suburbs rather than with another city, such as Baltimore, where homicides also declined during the same period. The statistics re: Baltimore are 16 years old and laughable. It ain't for nuttin that Baltimore, Maryland is known by its street thugs as Bodymore Murderland. Hon. It's not even safe downey ocean.
13
posted on
03/13/2008 3:16:59 AM PDT
by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
To: neverdem
A 1991 study found an almost 25 percent decline in homicides and a 23 percent drop in suicides by firearms following the ban..
What a BS! The homicides and suicides by firearms may be decreased 25% and 23% respectively , but total homicides and suicides did not! So,what is the deal? Do they prefer homicides and suicides by knife,crow bar, bath tub, ?
14
posted on
03/13/2008 3:42:36 AM PDT
by
SeeSalt
To: neverdem; All
ok where’s the barf alert?
15
posted on
03/13/2008 4:09:43 AM PDT
by
notdownwidems
(Shellback, pollywogs! 1980)
To: notdownwidems
“...from conservative candidates like Virginia Sen. Jim Webb,...”
Please, don’t make me barf without warning.
TC
To: neverdem
in 1996, the House voted to repeal the assault weapons ban Wow... Agitprop Central!
Since when is NOT voting to RENEW a law that was only passed because it carried a built-in expiration considered the same as "[voting] to repeal a law?
This is beyond spin. It's pure unreconstructed agitprop.
17
posted on
03/13/2008 1:22:39 PM PDT
by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
To: endthematrix
"Every day about two dozen officers fan out across the city's roughest blackest neighborhoods, stopping drivers and pedestrians for traffic and other offenses and executing warrants in search of illegal guns." How does that work?
How do they get warrants to search cars and pedestrians at will? From the way this reads, they're walking around with a pad of warrant blanks -- fill in the name, tear off the sheet, and UAW/MF.
18
posted on
03/13/2008 1:28:30 PM PDT
by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
To: Don Joe
Um ... actually ... in 1996, the House DID vote to repeal the AWB. The Senate did not deign to agree. This is not to be confused with the AWB expiring in 2004.
19
posted on
03/13/2008 1:30:51 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
To: neverdem
But supporters of gun control say that the strength of the National Rifle Association in many states makes it nearly impossible to even discuss laws targeting illegal guns.An outright lie.
20
posted on
03/13/2008 1:34:37 PM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson