Why? All she did was make a valid point. The democrats are all of a sudden shocked that identity politics are a part of the liberal democrat party?
Making comments on the emperor’s lack of clothing is not permitted.
Another case of employment arkancide. And this is just with Hillary losing. How many people have lost their jobs this campaign because of Hillary? If s/he wins there will many more employment arkancides.
If she was going to comment that the reason that Obama was were he was because he was lucky to be a black man, she needed to add that the only reasons that Hillary was were she was because she was female and had been married to a former President.
She has no other qualifications.
The feminists are upset that race is beating gender!
She seemed to have no problem with the Dems butt kissing toward WOMEN.
But showing the same kind of favoritism toward NEGROES?
Oh,Heaven forbid they do THAT!
Very well said.
I agree. Geraldine spoke the truth. Something Dems never want to hear.
I remember back in 1960 when just about every Roman Catholic voted for JFK. Solely because they wanted him to break ground and become the first Catholic President.
Black people are doing the same today. They want this man, Obama, to pave the way as the first black President.
I don’t blame them. What’s wrong with ethnic pride? They are registering and voting in record numbers, because they see a black man who will represent them.
Just like the Catholics did with Kennedy.
So Geraldine is absolutely right. If Barack had inherited mostly his mother’s genes and was pale white, I don’t think we would be seeing this phenomenon.
It’s just a statement of fact.
They are going to do the same thing to Republican (in spades) once the nomination has been determined.
Dems are such cowards when they break the pc rules.
The Dimorats seem to try to be more bothered by the color of a politicians skin that they are bothered by the Philanderer In Chief they kept in the White House for 8 years, along with his Chief Enabler- his WINO.