Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn

“He said it’s her obligation to be the best she can be because men have ‘needs’.”

It’s funny how the Bible has no carve-outs or exemptions to the “no adultery” command because of everybody’s perceived needs. If a man or woman feels the need to commit adultery, they should own up to the fact that they are an adulterer, and quit blaming others for their choice. What if a spouse is injured or disabled and unable to have sexual relations? Do the “needs” of the other spouse mean they are allowed to go off and sleep with other people?


138 posted on 03/12/2008 7:58:56 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Cecily

Your scenario shouldn’t apply (for non-loser men who will cheat anyway), because the problem in “withholding” isn’t necessarily the lack of sex itself but rather the rejection.

I know men who haven’t gotten any in 2+ years. Chances are, they COULD have had it at least once or twice, but they stop asking.

There’s nothing quite like the shame of rejection.


142 posted on 03/12/2008 8:04:16 AM PDT by Palmetto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: Cecily

The caller was obviously a low life.


168 posted on 03/12/2008 8:34:42 AM PDT by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson