Posted on 03/11/2008 6:53:35 PM PDT by Callahan
A 22-year-old escort found on another call-girl Web site claimed to ABC News in a phone interview that Gov. Eliot Spitzer had been one of her customers two years ago when he was New York attorney general and that he was a nice guy who tipped well.
"He didn't do anything that wasn't clean," she said, adding that she knew who he was because he had made calls from the attorney general's office in Brooklyn, N.Y.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Guess we now know the bottom line...
On the one hand, there probably are plenty such whores. On the other hand, I’m to believe a whore? Why shouldn’t any opportunistic prostitute make this claim, and then kindly charge ABC or CBS or whoever a few bucks for her time? That’s what she’s good at, doncha know. 50% chance she’s BSing.
He should resign merely for his failure to understand the technology of Caller I.D.
Using the city’s phone for personal reasons. But, who knows if she’s telling the truth.
Spitzer has to have a mental problem.
I bet he is so mad right now, he could spitz!
The article you posted had no mention of Sptizer’s political party affiliation. Anyone know?
/sarcasm
Man slut.
Should be easy enough to cross-reference calls made. I am pretty sure that telephone companies keep billing records for a very long time.
What! No pic? =o)
Senator Clinton, what's your understanding of the meaning of the word "clean?"
He liked the youngens. Not much older than his daughter.
Reminds me of the old joke...
What did the prostitute say to the Leper?
"No thanks, you can keep the tip"
Wonder if she kept records. Making calls from DA’s office is about as brazen as it gets. The NY Post said Elliot’s taste for call girls was well know within the NYC “sex industry.” Sort of an open secret I guess. Really amazing he lasted as long as he did.
Spitz’s advice to criminals:
“Never talk when you can nod, and never nod when you can wink, and never write an e-mail because it’s death,” the then-New York attorney general said. “You’re giving prosecutors all the evidence we need.”
the way he moved an estimated $40,000 through various accounts violated federal money laundering laws.
“These are serious laws and laws that given the amount of money involved here could mean a prison term of 10 to 18 months,”
The bad part is, his wife never understood why Client #9 kept showing up on caller ID when he called home.
Not guilty!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.