Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

Why “stand by your man”? No, Michael, it’s to Silda’s credit she stood by, it does not mean she won’t dump him, but assuming she was shocked and startled and had to make a split decision what to do as the press was getting cameras ready, she kept in mind she has 3 daughters going to be affected, and decided to not do anything overly dramatic at the time. We will see, she has her options open now, she did not rush to a rash decision, she left it to Spitzer’s constituents to pass judgment. Women tend to first react by wanting family unity, especially if children are involved, but as details come out, she may dump him, let’s give her benefit of the doubt, she acted with class.


22 posted on 03/11/2008 3:43:44 PM PDT by baa39 (Defend our troops! see my profile page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: baa39

She was used as a human shield by her husband just like McGreevey, etc. What a scum!


26 posted on 03/11/2008 3:47:16 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one recipe at a time http://www.youtube.com/Tamar1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: baa39

I have to disagree with you on this one. I think her standing there at his side at the press conference, gives the appearance of forgiveness for his actions. I think she should have been “in seclusion” while weighing her options (staying with el scumbag should not be one of the options!)


27 posted on 03/11/2008 3:48:03 PM PDT by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson