Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Hmmmm...I wonder how long before Bill Clinton’s name doesn’t come to light in this whole mess?!?


217 posted on 03/12/2008 4:03:57 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: harpu

I will give Bill Clinton credit for probably not having to pay in the thousands to have sex with someone. He probably knows the score: $400 is enough for the best looking women who “sell direct” and there are so many ways to make a free trip to Paris or the Virgin Islands have “strings attached” that any man of means can buy whatever he wants “indirectly” if he feels he has to buy a woman’s affections in the first place (you offer a free trip to the Virgin Islands and the other person gets hooked and knows what they probably have to do to get more trips).

Of course, after the way he called Monica “that woman”, I wouldn’t blame most women from avoiding him or being very wary.

I had someone working for me once who accidentally activated his Nextel phone walkie talkie function to his wife, while he was leaning against a wall and commenting to another guy about the beautiful girls walking by. He was saying “I’d sure like to plug that one” or whatever.

When his wife got furious over what she heard, the man got even more furious that she had quietly listened in on her.

He was so convincing in his argument that his wife had cheated him more by listening in than he had by talking that way to his coworker, that I ended up giving him a raise.

It takes integrity to stand up for one’s civil right not to have one’s privacy badly invaded. And yes, if you pick your nose or burp in the Oval Office, that is privacy that does not need filming simply because you are President.

I lost respect for Clinton when he accepted the BS that Ken Starr had bullied Monica into “confessing”.

I would have said “Monica is a friend of mine and I consider anything bullied out of her to have been highly illegal”...and I would have strongly pursued that angle.

I would have stood right behind him on that.

If he had done so and if Gore had characterized Ken Starr as a fascist in 2000, Gore might now be President.

But, because liberals are more into fascism and Big Brother than Ken Starr ever thought of being, Clinton didn’t oppose the fact that Monica had been bullied to discuss her private life.

Instead, he called her “that woman” and lied when he did not have to.

He also insulted Yasser Arafat by allowing the question at that time, but Yasser needed insulting. :-)

A lot of liberal women joined the Republican Party because of the Monica Lewinsky case. They were furious with the other feminists for giving a man a pass for cheating on his wife because they strongly believed that this should be a federal offense. These feminists believe that violence or cheating against women is a federal offense and this is now codified into law by VAWA an update of which Bush signed in early January 2006 despite the Rehnquist court implying it was all highly unconstitutional.

We have yet to purge the Republican Party of these imposters. Heck, I am sure there are plenty on FR.


218 posted on 03/12/2008 6:15:07 AM PDT by BavarianAlps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson