Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
I guarantee that the settlement agreement specifically stipulates that the state of UT does not acknowledge any wrongdoing.

It's a tiny settlement amount and likely represents an amount that UT considers to be lower than the cost of continuing to litigate the case through judgment and appeals, etc.

The fact of a settlement does not constitute an admission of guilt in any way.

You are most likely right. Thats too bad it ended this way, but there is no other way for the police to protect himself from from a situation that could have otherwise gotten out of control and he used non-lethal force. Thats what tasers are for.

13 posted on 03/11/2008 8:22:18 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: KC_Conspirator
way for the police to protect himself from from a situation that could have otherwise gotten out of control and he used non-lethal force. Thats what tasers are for.

Yeah Right. 75% of Taser use is from a lazy LEO who rather inflict pain than do his job. The other 25% of tasering is used for its intended purpose.

22 posted on 03/11/2008 8:34:10 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson