Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2008 4:15:11 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kellynla

bump for later


2 posted on 03/09/2008 4:16:55 AM PDT by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Bwaaaa-ha-ha-ha! There was a 30-minute segment that was conservative weighted against 23 hours and 30 minutes that was liberal, and the liberals are howling. Although NPR probably was aiming for “balance” or a larger listening audience, I guess they presume they will be exempted from any potential Fairness Doctrine legislation. And still the irony escapes the liberals completely.


3 posted on 03/09/2008 4:22:30 AM PDT by shezza (WWRD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I used to listen to npr on a regular basis. They lost me when all I heard from supposedly un biased reporters was liberal facts that I knew were not true. This is where the Clintons have it right, itdoesn’t matter if what you say is true, just say it first.


4 posted on 03/09/2008 4:23:05 AM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

“According to NPR ombudsman Alicia Shepard, more than 60 angry e-mails and phone calls arrived at the network, calling the programming “shameful” and a “lovefest with radical, right-wing nuts.” There were only a few, she said, that praised the series as “refreshing” and “articulate,” among other things.”

That’s because only a “few” conservatives listen to NPR.

Conservatives could e-mail the program and claim it “a lovefest with radical, left-wing nuts”, but what difference would it make?

“All Things Considered” is quite an example or perhaps an oxymoron.


5 posted on 03/09/2008 4:24:24 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
So, they got a "flood" of sixty complaints out of how many million listeners?

Let those sixty, narrow-minded leftists start their own publicly financed radio network.

8 posted on 03/09/2008 4:30:13 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

NPR listeners — there are 13 million a week — were not especially pleased in the aftermath of the broadcast segments, which lasted about seven minutes each.

According to NPR ombudsman Alicia Shepard, more than 60 angry e-mails and phone calls arrived at the network,

13 million listeners and only 60 calls and e mails, I am suprised.


9 posted on 03/09/2008 4:32:42 AM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
National Public Radio listeners who tuned in to "Morning Edition" during the last four days of February found… "Conversations with Conservatives"… lasted about seven minutes each.

Generated

more than 60 angry e-mails and phone calls arrived at the network, calling the programming "shameful" and a "lovefest with radical, right-wing nuts."

NPR listeners are a bunch of whining crybabies.

I stopped listening to NPR years ago because all I ever heard was the same liberal BS day after day week after week.

For the same reason I stopped watching CNN, NBC, CBS and ABC.

Mr. Inskeep is philosophical about his vexed audience.

"We did annoy our listeners, but if we do our job right, we function as a personal intelligence agency for them. Hopefully, they hear allies and enemies and everybody in between. We have to learn from a wide range of people," he said.

Nice words I will wait and see if he follows through. I doubt that he will because NPR is dependant on contributions of its listeners for funding. He will quickly fold if the money stops coming in form listeners.

10 posted on 03/09/2008 4:34:32 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
This is a ploy all the MSM is adopting. For the next 8-9 months the MSM will be running little Conservative segments so after the election if Obama or Clinton wins they won't be accused of pandering to their lefty friends. All of their segments with Conservatives will be all about Democrat talking points instead of the right way.
11 posted on 03/09/2008 4:39:15 AM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

It’s too bad NPR is so leftwingy because the production quality is excellent and listening without commercials is great. With Rush, it’s a commerical every 7 minutes. Liberals don’t know how good they have it.

BTW, the fact that NPR feels compelled to give some special time to conservatives proves their bias. Deep down they know their programming leans left and needs balancing.


12 posted on 03/09/2008 4:44:26 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
60 out of 13,000,000?????

What is this?

Some NPR stooge trying to make some ridiculous argument that NPR is somehow "relevant"?

14 posted on 03/09/2008 4:49:38 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
... atypical programming ...

That's the truth!

15 posted on 03/09/2008 4:49:46 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Kind of interesting how equal time doesn’t apply to taxpayer funded public radio...


16 posted on 03/09/2008 4:51:15 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
National Public Radio listeners who tuned in to "Morning Edition" during the last four days of February found some atypical programming around 6:30 a.m.

That was nice of NPR to put the conservatives on during prime time. /s

18 posted on 03/09/2008 4:56:03 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

OMG! Sixty angry emails! Image if they had interviewed a theologian who cast doubt on the divinity of Barack!


21 posted on 03/09/2008 5:09:19 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The women got the vote and the Nation got Harding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

The quality of NPR programming is generally far above the commercial media where the listener is typically subjected to shouting matches and human interest BS. I have also noticed that there has been more political balance lately.


25 posted on 03/09/2008 5:40:52 AM PDT by Aikonaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I peruse the DU for the comedic value and a few weeks ago there was a thread about PBR going “conservative”..they were PI*SED that conservatives would be allowed on national PUBLIC radio..so in watching this thread, someone made that exact comment..I’ll paraphrase because I don’t remember the exact words..”so, what’s wrong with that? It’s PUBLIC radio and their tax dollars support it to, shouldn’t they have a voice??”..shortly thereafter the poster’s comments were deleted..I’m guessin he/she got tombstoned..

but ask them, they’ll tell you they’re the party of diversity and tolerance..


26 posted on 03/09/2008 5:44:17 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (If the left doesn't want me to say Barack HUSSEIN Obama, I WON'T say HUSSEIN..I promise,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

NPR needs to be axed, with extreme malice!


27 posted on 03/09/2008 5:53:23 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Some NPR Listeners Left Cold by Segments on Right(Lefties’ heads explode!LOL).....

the lib/dems....still defending the 1st their first amendment...everyone can have an opion and say what they want as long as it conforms to the lib/dem talking points...

A perfect reason both NPR and PBS should NOT be tax payer funded!!!!


30 posted on 03/09/2008 6:08:48 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I remember NPR attempted to add balance to their news reporting and commentary during the first year or two of the Republican led Congress in ‘95-’96. NPR must have been terrified their funding would be slashed. As soon as the storm had passed they were back to their comtemptible selves.


33 posted on 03/09/2008 6:29:32 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Well it is National Liberal Public Radio.


37 posted on 03/09/2008 7:07:06 AM PDT by CarryingOn (Spread the message every day, like your life depended on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson