Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat

While I tend to be slightly more fiscally conservative than socially conservative, I have to admit that it was more social rather than fiscal conservatism that put the Republicans into power. In Ohio, the people tend to side with Republicans on social issues and Democrats on economic issues,despite how awful the Rats are on the economy.


343 posted on 03/09/2008 8:06:57 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]


To: conservativebuckeye
Any one voter segment of the Republican coalition can and does often claim responsibility for getting party members elected, but on the other side of the coin, any segment that fails to turn out in a mass effort, is also just as responsible for defeat. They never claim that....LOL

Bush 1 lost largely because the socials stayed home. The data proved it in many electoral districts, and it's not just them, but they are the hardest to get motivated because they need a catalyst, and are not necessarily just loyal voters like the folks we call fondly, "broken glass republicans".

We have a fatal problem this cycle, because we alienated Hispanics, demeaned the fiscals, and lost the younger crowd because of pandering to the socials.

Now we insult the conservatives by putting up McCain.

This election is so screwed.

The only way McCain wins, is for the Dems to flee their commitment to Hilary or Obama and vote for McCain in November. We don't have the votes yet to elect him, and I don't think we ever will against their apparent record turnouts.. The Republican electorate power has been destroyed.

346 posted on 03/09/2008 10:07:21 PM PDT by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson