Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yldstrk

Winning in Iraq and preventing attacks on US soil for 7 years= failed presidency? How many attacks would there have been under Gore? How about a nuclear armed Saddam supplying weapons to Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan? These count for nothing?


70 posted on 03/08/2008 10:35:09 PM PST by boop (Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: boop
Winning in Iraq and preventing attacks on US soil for 7 years= failed presidency? How many attacks would there have been under Gore? How about a nuclear armed Saddam supplying weapons to Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan? These count for nothing?
"Winning" in Iraq? The stabilization and rehabilitation of Iraq should have taken 2 years. At most. Rumsfeld decided he was going to show the world that he could take anybody out and take over their country with a streamlined military. It failed. Miserably.

The Bush presidency has had precisely the opposite effect. It has *emboldened* America's enemies. Why do you think Hamas, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba are all doing happy dances around Jorge?

74 posted on 03/09/2008 12:42:01 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson