Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Camera Doesn’t Lie, but It Can Get Confused
NY Times ^ | March 8, 2008 | JIM DWYER

Posted on 03/08/2008 4:35:02 PM PST by neverdem

The first camera in the room grabbed my face, put it on a screen and then began a computer analysis. It correctly identified me as male. Then the camera focused and followed my eyes, with a little box appearing around each one on the screen.

Below the image, a meter displayed each emotion that the computer had detected: Happy. Sad. Angry. Surprised. A trace of a smile triggered the happy meter; a raised eyebrow sent the anger meter skyrocketing. Some tic was registered as sadness.

A second camera went after solid data from the face. It measured distances from jaw to nose to brow, cheekbone to cheekbone and other planes of unnoticed geometry.

The computer built a model from these readings, then ran it through a database of other faces from people who had voluntarily submitted to the imaging.

The result?

“It shows a 51 percent likelihood that you’re a person enrolled here a while ago,” said Theo Cushing, a consultant for the International Biometrics Group. “But it didn’t say there’s a match.”

All this took place in a laboratory and showroom in Lower Manhattan operated by International Biometrics, which tests the technologies of biometrics — the quick measurement of human characteristics that are thought to be unique and, thus, a trustworthy way of identifying people.

Few biometrics have been chased as hard and — so far — as futilely as systems that can recognize faces from long distances, with the Department of Defense investing hundreds of millions of dollars in them in recent years.

If they worked, such systems could look over crowds of people, or just one person at a time, and see if a face matched any image in a database. This is described as “mass covert data capture” in the world of biometrics...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Technical; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; biometrics; identification; imaging; photography

Robert Caplin for The New York Times
Theo Cushing, left, and Peter Cheesman were categorized and identified using a 3-D facial recognition device at International Biometrics Group.
1 posted on 03/08/2008 4:35:03 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

holy Orwellian Nightmare, batman!


2 posted on 03/08/2008 4:40:50 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (dehumanize: the model prescribes the required behavior. disincentives ensure compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
let's see...couple technology overreach with militant police tactics and...

how many innocent people's lives do you think will be ruined?

3 posted on 03/08/2008 4:47:17 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (dehumanize: the model prescribes the required behavior. disincentives ensure compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

4 posted on 03/08/2008 4:53:02 PM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
how many innocent people's lives do you think will be ruined?

More or fewer than HillaryCare?

5 posted on 03/08/2008 4:56:19 PM PST by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
the invisib1e hand said: ""How many innocent people's lives do you think will be ruined?"

All of them, unfortunately.

6 posted on 03/08/2008 4:57:57 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

How do you suppose they'd categorize this fellow?

7 posted on 03/08/2008 5:01:04 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (dehumanize: the model prescribes the required behavior. disincentives ensure compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
How do you suppose they'd categorize this fellow?

Democrat or Code Pink would be my guess

8 posted on 03/08/2008 5:24:03 PM PST by teacherwoes (vote for the great evil--Cthulu/Hillary '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; Chode; ...
Armed Guard and No Door, but Recruiters Carry On (only $12,000 reward for bomber's conviction?)

Fort Drum Prints Photos After Arrests for D.W.I.

FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.

9 posted on 03/08/2008 9:28:12 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


10 posted on 03/08/2008 10:18:41 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson