Posted on 03/07/2008 4:40:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Neither is condescension.
You don't have faith in God because God allows bad things to happen. Yet you post on a website that preaches freedom. You see a problem there?
But you're correct about faith, faith is not science. Which puts a large burden on science.
So tell me DG, where did the E, M and C come from in Einstein's famous E=MC^2? Was it there before time started? Was it stored in some other universe? Of course that just is the ultimate regress that materialists impose on God. But what the hell, what's good for the Luddite creationists is certainly good for the secular materialists.
BTW, the fellow that posited the BBT was a Catholic Priest. Perhaps his faith led him to that magnificent piece of scientific work, perhaps not. But the secular materialists were enmeshed in a steady state universe because their secularism demanded it. They were, evidently, wrong and the Catholic Priest was correct. Life's a bitch.
kinda petty to do so- iether you can agree with what was said, or give a reason why you can’t agree with it- rather than mining for points to belittle with.
no- they were giants
[[BECAUSE IT MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER]]
Makes no sense to someone who can’t see tyhe spiritual world- but whatever- you’re allowed your opinion.
woodworth is speaking about modern day, not in the days before Christ- although those kinds of miracles were not all that common- but here’s a point you probably haven’t seen- EVEN though they had those miracles, and saw them with their own eyes, they STILL refused to believe- much like you who has hte testimony of many that miracles happened-
[[Thats not a logical answer. Its an answer, which might be correct, but based entirely on faith. Faith is not to be confused with logic.]]
Yeah, it’s much more logical to refuse a free gift that saves the soul for eternity. think you have a mistaken view of faith- faith isn’t blind ignorance- it is certainty established and rewarded.
Sure; but why would I waste my time speculating about the unknowable?
The words belong to no particular system.
Yes, I see a problem with a person who doesn't know me, who has no idea what I believe, what relationship I have with God, or anything else about me, to make such stupid conclusions.
I could make similar stupid conclusions about you, but I won't. It's not my place.
I didn't make up the natural laws of the universe that we can observe. I can only observe them and, in fact, must. Those alone don't tell me anything about why they are the laws, only that they are the laws.
The facts are what they are. Any outside meaning one wants to ascribe to them are either speculation or faith.
Good, I'm looking forward to the discovery of fossil giant men. The trend has been toward discovering smaller and smaller hominids. Not a giant among them.
Do you think scientists have found them and are destroying them to prevent the information about them from being revealed?
I guess I don't really care if you and your friends think I can't see tyhe the spiritual world.
You won't answer my questions, and because you can't, you assume I'm evil.
Try this. Ask yourself those questions.
Actually the first sentence was supposed to have a question mark. It should have read: "You don't have faith in God because God allows bad things to happen? Yet you post on a website that preaches freedom. You see a problem there?
However you wrote above:
If God is so smart, all-knowing; the future, past, and present are all known to him, why did he create earth?Sure, it all suppposedly turns out great in the end, but in the meantime, there are billions and billions of people who suffer greatly, all die, and tons of horrible stuff happens.
God does a Flood which accomplishes nothing. He sends part of the Trinity to earth to enlighten people and to get tortured and executed.
Why not just think, I think Ill just pass on creating this planet? Its not going to turn out so well, and there will be a whole lot of sorrow that can be avoided. I dont really need to see throats slit in the name of Allah.
...which gives me ample reason for asking you that question.
Of course I asked you others which you were loathe to touch upon for good reason. You don't have any answers. But that doesn't stop you from asking those same type questions to creationists.
Why is that?
So tell me DG, where did the E, M and C come from in Einstein's famous E=MC^2? Was it there before time started? Was it stored in some other universe?I don't know how to answer that. It's clearly the rule in our universe. It's pretty hard for me to weigh in on any other. I don't know why you think that is a "gotcha" question. I don't really feel pinned to the wall with those.
ROFLOL
You again in a previous post: "Any thoughts as to what God was doing for infinity prior to creating the universe?"
This leaves one of two possibilities. The first is that you're a hypocrite. And the second is that you don't understand that each is the age old infinite regress problem.
Your problem is that being a methodological naturalist you are bound to come up with a better answer than you don't feel got. Creationists have no such duty. They have, by definition, faith.
You understand now?
Have you come across the proposal that consciousness is an infinite iteration, something like the receding images in the barber’s mirrors? Douglas Hofstadter wrote ‘I Am A Strange Loop’ not long ago to try to explain that and some more about Goedel’s famous logical proofs.
[snip]You understand now?
No, because that wasn't in english. I'm GUESSING that you're saying I asked a question with no possible answer, and that since I did so, I'm somehow a hypocrite.
I have no clue what a methadological naturalist is, but if you care to insult me some more, go ahead and lay out your diagnosis of me, doctor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.