Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2008 12:18:13 PM PST by rosenfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Coyoteman; blam

Popcorn


2 posted on 03/07/2008 12:19:43 PM PST by ASA Vet (Only a suicidal fool would have Hillary as VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Impossible. I hear the earth is only 6,000 years old.


3 posted on 03/07/2008 12:19:48 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Oh, really?............


4 posted on 03/07/2008 12:20:10 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Clark: ‘...It’s only the biggest gd hole in the world!’
Aunt Edna: ‘Clark! Watch your language!’
Clark: ‘Make that the second biggest.’


5 posted on 03/07/2008 12:20:43 PM PST by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lil'freeper

Ping


7 posted on 03/07/2008 12:21:43 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

helen thomas is older than previously thought too !

8 posted on 03/07/2008 12:21:55 PM PST by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Its old as dirt.


11 posted on 03/07/2008 12:27:19 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan; All
The Grand Canyon

One of the most awe inspiring sights on the planet.

Anyone who has not seen this thing of unimaginable beauty should make it a goal to see it before they die.

It is well worth the time and money.

12 posted on 03/07/2008 12:29:08 PM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

I remember when it was the Grand Gulch.


13 posted on 03/07/2008 12:29:20 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

More wild guesses.


16 posted on 03/07/2008 12:35:28 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

That’s because for 11 million years it kept telling people it was “39”.


20 posted on 03/07/2008 12:41:04 PM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

So it was 6 million years old +/-12 million?


23 posted on 03/07/2008 12:44:25 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Since it changes daily, today’s grand canyon is but a day old.


26 posted on 03/07/2008 12:45:44 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan
Ken Ham says 6,000 years, max, give or take a counterfeit dinosaur fossil!
30 posted on 03/07/2008 12:51:08 PM PST by Jagman (Liberalism is a "progressive" disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

The Grand Canyon cost so much to dig that the National Park Service still charges admission in order to pay off the debt.


38 posted on 03/07/2008 1:07:04 PM PST by Captain Pike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

If a bunch of geologists got together and agreed the Grand Canyon was 30 million years old, would that make it true?


48 posted on 03/07/2008 1:36:51 PM PST by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

The only reason I would have to doubt this is that the world is a terribly destructive place.

The Grand Canyon area is the site of a very old upwelling of mountains, that were then eroded down to sediment, then the sediment was uplifted, and *then* washed down by the Colorado River. The river cut through all that sediment to its base, where it exposed the roots of the ancient mountains.

Now, for those of you who have never seen the Grand Canyon in person, let me assure you, you cannot see the canyon with mere photographs. That thing is enormous. A crack in the world.

Be it a mere six million years, or 17 million years, the big question is, how could this be done here, but nowhere else?

Some comparisons can be made with Copper Canyon in Mexico, Snake River Canyon in Idaho, or the Great Rift of Africa. But they all look a lot more like each other, like “normal” canyons, than the Grand Canyon.

It’s not just size, because parts of the six canyons of Copper Canyon are deeper; and it’s not entirely location, because Snake River Canyon is in a similar situation.

Today, it’s a high desert, but even just 50,000 years ago it was warmer and wetter grasslands. That was when a gigantic meteor hit about 100 miles away, in a 2.5 Megaton blast.

You would think the canyon would have noticed. Apparently not.


56 posted on 03/07/2008 2:00:46 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

As some people thought it was only 4000 years old, this is not surprising


66 posted on 03/07/2008 2:49:35 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Never say yer sorry, mister. It's a sign of weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan; All
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Grand Canyon, carved out over the eons by rushing river water, began to form 17 million years ago, making it nearly three times older than previously thought, scientists (emphasis mine) said on Thursday.

The problem that I have with such glaring miscalculations is that "scientists" evidently don't have evolution-related "facts" down to a science.

68 posted on 03/07/2008 2:59:08 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rosenfan

Whenever there is an article like this posted folks jump up and say the creationists (defined as those believing the “days” of Genesis are 24 hr. each) are taking Genesis literally. Uh..no they aren’t. They are defining the term “day” as 24 hours and taking their definition literally.
The difference? Well, the term day can mean more than just 24 hrs. and from the Bible itself it’s clear that 24 hrs. is not meant here. Those “days” began after “In the beginning” during which time the heavens (everything beyond earth like stars) and earth are created. That leaves quite a bit time between “In the beginning” and “Let light come to be”. How much time may be of interest to scientists of today but there is no way whatsoever to determine it fron the account. And it is no importance to the length of the “days” that follow.
The “Earth Was Created 6,000 Years Ago” Creationists are defending a single meaning of a word and those attacking their position with big guns could blow it away with few breaths if they understood what was really being argued.
Beating on the other side may be fun but it doesn’t make them wrong.


72 posted on 03/07/2008 4:29:25 PM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson