Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

seem low to me also as there are warnings of one mile with regular 22 bullets.


39 posted on 03/07/2008 9:49:37 AM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fish hawk

There’s a difference between “accurate” and “harmful”. The former is the ability to pierce a mellon deliberately from a mile, the latter is the potential to pierce a mellon that happens to be wherever the bullet comes down.


62 posted on 03/07/2008 10:00:15 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: fish hawk
seem low to me also as there are warnings of one mile with regular 22 bullets.

That's "max effective Range", meaning the range at which one could expect a well trained shooter to hit a man sized target. However the maximum range that the bullet can reach, and cause damage should it hit anything is much longer. So yes a .22 can reach a mile or mile and a half, but this thing should reach much farther, but you could not do any more than harassing or "ranging" fire. With an automatic weapon, that can still be quite effective, but with low capacity bolt or semiautomatic it would be no more than harassment.

137 posted on 03/07/2008 12:48:42 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson