[kabar]

I could go on. You really think a Democrat wouldn't throw a bone towards building a fence on the Mexican border if it meant securing a second term? All you 'McAmnesty' chanters, answer me this: If Hillary was president and she actually succeeded in securing our borders, would you consider voting for her come re-election time? It could happen. Anti-illegal immigration is hardly a Republican selling point over the Democrats.

If amnesty passes, this country is finished. McCain, Hillary, and Obama all voted for amnesty in 2006 [S. 2611] and McCain-Kennedy. Once that happens, everything else is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Hillary will not get the nomination, but if she does, she will owe Hispanic voters a tremendous debt. McCain thinks he can pander to Hispanics by selling this country out. He is known as the "Amnesty King" in the immigration community. I for one will not be complicit in the destruction of this country by voting for McCain, Hillary, or Obama.

A bunch of us are doing something about it. RAMM

[Antonello]

A bunch of us are doing something about it. RAMM

I visited your ramm site, but don't really see what you and your 'bunch of us' are doing other than slamming McCain, and therefore by default campaigning for the Democrats.

News flash: Despite your opinion of the popularity of your personal ideology, the truth is more people are happy with McCain than you want to admit. He may not measure up as a 'true conservative' to you, but he actually does appeal to a very large number of Americans. Note I didn't just say Republicans, but then again he isn't running to be President of the Republicans of the United States of America, is he?

Bottom line is McCain is just too darned popular despite not being acceptable to you. And that must really piss you off.

[isrul]

While it's true Hillary and Obama support amnesty. McCain actually did something to try and bring it about. And he was proud enough to put his name on it. Even ahead of Kennedy.