Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
The court made its final decision to euthanize her in January, 2006, by which time she was showing signs of alertness.<>Another death sentence for a citizen ccharged with nothing except being abused issued by a state.

Should the federal government have stepped in to protect her right to life if the state of Massachusetts tried to kill her?

One would think so but not Barack Obama and a whole host of folks on the right. Their reasoning?

Evidently state sanctioned death sentences imposed on innocent children are none of the federal governments business.

Laugh or cry if you will but that's their position.

12 posted on 03/06/2008 4:39:12 PM PST by jwalsh07 (Obama, the King of Hope-a-Dope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Evidently state sanctioned death sentences imposed on innocent children are none of the federal governments business.

Laugh or cry if you will but that's their position.

You are, tragically, 100% correct.

It is getting very difficult to protect innocent life, when people on both the right and left are condoning murder.

15 posted on 03/06/2008 4:41:06 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson