Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10

What I want to know is why are you seemingly trying to sidestep my opinion that California homeschool code is poorly written?

******************************************

Because it implies that this was written with homeschoolers in mind. It was not. It was an education code the pre-existed before homeschooling became popular. As the movement grew, judges ruled on the legality of homeshcooling. This is how we got to where we are today. Judges decided that homeschooling would be legal under the private school provision of the code. NO ONE wrote it to be FOR homeschooling. It just got used for homeschoolers.

Frankly, I don’t understand why you don’t get that this is a hot potatoe for homeschooling. This is NOT a friendly state. The left is in charge of the government, the schools and most of the judges. If this law was to be re-written, it would kill homeschooling in this state. I don’t get how you don’t get that!

In another time and place, reasonable people could write a clean law without bias and that would be that. We do not live in such a time. The left wants other peoples children because they kill their own, or they don’t have them at all. (gays) If they want to indoctrinate all children into their communism, they HAVE to have ALL the children. Did you not know that?


99 posted on 03/07/2008 12:20:41 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: TruthConquers
Because it implies that this was written with homeschoolers in mind. It was not. It was an education code the pre-existed before homeschooling became popular. As the movement grew, judges ruled on the legality of homeshcooling. This is how we got to where we are today. Judges decided that homeschooling would be legal under the private school provision of the code. NO ONE wrote it to be FOR homeschooling. It just got used for homeschoolers.

On a similar note, New York state judges were at least honest enough to admit that the NY constitution said nothing about gay marriage when that issue came up recently, putting the legal ball for deciding gay marriage in NY legislator's court. Based on what you've said about the judicially "converted" homeschooling laws, however, California essentially gave judges the license to legislate homeschooling laws from the bench on a silver platter.

What a mess!

In fact, Californians are probably a prime example of epidemic ignorance of how the government is supposed to work as evidenced by the following link.

http://tinyurl.com/hehr8
Frankly, I don’t understand why you don’t get that this is a hot potatoe for homeschooling. This is NOT a friendly state. The left is in charge of the government, the schools and most of the judges. If this law was to be re-written, it would kill homeschooling in this state. I don’t get how you don’t get that!

Are you saying that California's majority voters don't want homeschooling?

In another time and place, reasonable people could write a clean law without bias and that would be that. We do not live in such a time. The left wants other peoples children because they kill their own, or they don’t have them at all. (gays) If they want to indoctrinate all children into their communism, they HAVE to have ALL the children. Did you not know that?

The legal majority voters are the ultimate seat of power in California, not the left. So quit using the left as a scapegoat. If the majority has decided on voluntary servitude to their government, the Godless left, then that's their problem.

Also, as I mentioned in another post, Californians are seemingly a good example of the citizen apathy that Jefferson warned about.

"...Cherish therefore the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. Do not be too severe upon their errors, but reclaim them by enlightening them. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you & I, & Congress & Assemblies, judges & governors shall all become wolves. ..." --Jefferson to Edward Carrington, Jan. 16, 1787 http://tinyurl.com/46x5d

102 posted on 03/07/2008 1:56:15 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson