To: Lurker
It’s a lot of things, but “more durable?”
91 posted on
03/06/2008 1:25:04 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: Travis McGee
Really.
He could have said "more accurate", "technologically superior", "more adaptable", or even "just f'ing cooler looking".
But more durable? Give me a break. There isn't a weapon on the planet more durable than the Automat Kalashnikov Model of 1947.
Period.
L
92 posted on
03/06/2008 1:28:07 PM PST by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Travis McGee
It’s a lot of things, but “more durable?” I'm thinking COL Scott might not be a small arms specialist.
Just a guess.
Not much on earth that shoots bullets is more durable than the AK.
94 posted on
03/06/2008 1:30:24 PM PST by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson