Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: poobear
Dear poobear,

“You some lawyer or somethin’?”

No, just a homeschooling parent.

Here's HSLDA’s take on it, by the way:

Legal Option:

- Qualify as a private school
- Use a private tutor
- Enroll in a private school satellite program, taking “independent study”

[Option 1 Requirements - Qualify as a private school]
Attendance:
- None

Subjects:
- Same as the public schools and in the English language

Qualifications:
- Must be “capable of teaching”

Notice:
- File an annual affidavit with the Superintendent of Public Instruction between October 1 and 15

Recordkeeping:
- Maintain an attendance register

Testing:
- None

As you can see, although the court may be semantically correct that no one in California may “homeschool,” those who actually homeschool may do so legally by informing the state that they are a private school, by teaching a similar curriculum as is found in the public schools (that only means teaching similar subjects, not using similar texts, etc.), by declaring that one is “capable of teaching,” by keeping an attendance register, and by filing an affidavit to the effect of these requirements once per year.

Although my state, Maryland, doesn't call this “qualifying as a private school,” our requirements aren't very dissimilar.


sitetest

51 posted on 03/06/2008 8:00:42 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

“As you can see, although the court may be semantically correct that no one in California may “homeschool,” those who actually homeschool may do so legally by informing the state that they are a private school, by teaching a similar curriculum as is found in the public schools (that only means teaching similar subjects, not using similar texts, etc.), by declaring that one is “capable of teaching,” by keeping an attendance register, and by filing an affidavit to the effect of these requirements once per year.”

APPLAUSE!!!

Thanks again.


59 posted on 03/06/2008 8:05:22 AM PST by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest

Reference: “ those who actually homeschool may do so legally by informing the state that they are a private school, by teaching a similar curriculum as is found in the public schools (that only means teaching similar subjects, not using similar texts, etc.), by declaring that one is “capable of teaching,” by keeping an attendance register, and by filing an affidavit to the effect of these requirements once per year.”

Actually this case was about that kind of arrangement. Also involved was a Christian homeschool association that provided assistance with curricula, testing and such. The judge was saying that this was illegal. He dismissed the association’s involvement and said that its involvement was aiding in the circumvention of the law.
The judge was affirming that only certified, LICENSED teachers may teach their children.


68 posted on 03/06/2008 8:15:08 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest
As you can see, although the court may be semantically correct that no one in California may “homeschool,” those who actually homeschool may do so legally by informing the state that they are a private school,

According to Pacific Justice Institute, Sunland Christian School WAS in compliance re registering as a private school for over 20 years. This case is the real deal.

192 posted on 03/06/2008 2:32:26 PM PST by Carry_Okie (We have three options with Islam: victory, surrender, or death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson