Lie #1. The link leads back, ultimately --m which you'd know, if you'd actually followed it to its terminus -- to: "Hell [McCain] either win without conservatives, or with conservatives," precisely as stated. Not only are you a buffoon; you are an ineffectual one.
Post #42 is a link to Jim Robinson's McCain gets conservative grassroots support when.. which I commented on earlier. Beyond that, same stuff you toss out every day. Is that what you wanted me to see?
Post #42 leads to Post #250, on another thread. You know this, of course; what you might possibly hope to gain by playing the perpetual online slackwit -- provided, of course, that it is, in fact, all simply dumbshow on your part -- is more than I can understand, or (for that matter) care to. Good heavens.
I suppose 1 out 3 is a mark of accuracy for some folks.
Aim high, sister. Be the dream!
I am thick headed. I do have problems with languages, even English.
Two honest statements, in a row. A marked improvement; keep up the good work.
I'm not the one, however, attempting (presumably) to curry electoral favor for my chosen candidate by making assorted rude noises and gestures towards other, more principled conservatives, am I?
I repeat the above from my own posting, earlier, as you rather noisily and obviously fell down attempting not to acknowledge how it directly applied to Team Juan's efforts hereabouts, these past few weeks in particular. Just so we both know you didn't actually manage to get away with anything, is all.
I don't know what 11/07/08 will bring. I don't have a crystal ball and I'm not so rash as to make silly predictions this far out.
No one's (yet) questioned the comparative silliness of your predictions, lamb; just the overall efficacy of Team Juan's vote-gathering techniques (in general), and your own (in particular). Sorry that wasn't rendered clear enough for you, from the outset.
I call that a backstroke. "The link leads back, ultimately . . ." What a hoot, you are, night owl.
Post #42 leads to Post #250, on another thread.
Another backstroke.
Just learn how to use hyperlinks or learn how to explain how we're supposed to follow your muddled thinking.
Two honest statements, in a row. A marked improvement; keep up the good work.
Oh, if only you were half as honest.
I repeat the above from my own posting, earlier, as you rather noisily and obviously fell down attempting not to acknowledge how it directly applied to Team Juan's efforts hereabouts, these past few weeks in particular. Just so we both know you didn't actually manage to get away with anything, is all.
I did better than that. Unlike you, I was honest and wrote at #114: "I read the stuff hurled back and forth by everybody. There ain't no saints in this fight."
Hope you noticed. My hyperlink takes you right to the message I want you to see.
No one's (yet) questioned the comparative silliness of your predictions, lamb; just the overall efficacy of Team Juan's vote-gathering techniques (in general), and your own (in particular). Sorry that wasn't rendered clear enough for you, from the outset.
That is because I have not made any predictions, silly or otherwise, about what will come this November. You have.
You have a harder time than I remembering from message to message what you wrote at #171: "11/07/08 is going to come as one slow, awful awakening to you and yours, I'm afraid. Here's hoping you at least manage to benefit from the experience... if only just a little"
Notice how the hyperlink works? If you meant something different, that's okay. I know you're stressed and upset. I understand.