pardon me, but your thesis is FALSE. thus your conclusions are also FALSE. Pardon me, but your posts are full of it, have always been full of it, and add no value to the discussion.
according to you & "your buddies" of the lunatic/REVISIONIST/LEFTIST fringe of northeastern academia, ANYTHING that DISAGREES with YOUR agenda is false & "not worth discussing". ====> SORRY, N-S, but that's called :WILLFUL BLINDNESS and or "close-minded" BIGOTRY.
free dixie,sw