Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boys And Girls Brains Are Different: Gender Differences In Language Appear Biological
Science Daily ^ | 3-5-2008 | Northwestern University

Posted on 03/05/2008 2:15:27 PM PST by blam

Boys And Girls Brains Are Different: Gender Differences In Language Appear Biological

New research shows that areas of the brain associated with language work harder in girls than in boys during language tasks, and that boys and girls rely on different parts of the brain when performing these tasks. (Credit: iStockphoto/Rich Legg)

ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2008) — Although researchers have long agreed that girls have superior language abilities than boys, until now no one has clearly provided a biological basis that may account for their differences.

For the first time -- and in unambiguous findings -- researchers from Northwestern University and the University of Haifa show both that areas of the brain associated with language work harder in girls than in boys during language tasks, and that boys and girls rely on different parts of the brain when performing these tasks.

"Our findings -- which suggest that language processing is more sensory in boys and more abstract in girls -- could have major implications for teaching children and even provide support for advocates of single sex classrooms," said Douglas D. Burman, research associate in Northwestern's Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the researchers measured brain activity in 31 boys and in 31 girls aged 9 to 15 as they performed spelling and writing language tasks.

The tasks were delivered in two sensory modalities -- visual and auditory. When visually presented, the children read certain words without hearing them. Presented in an auditory mode, they heard words aloud but did not see them.

Using a complex statistical model, the researchers accounted for differences associated with age, gender, type of linguistic judgment, performance accuracy and the method -- written or spoken -- in which words were presented.

The researchers found that girls still showed significantly greater activation in language areas of the brain than boys. The information in the tasks got through to girls' language areas of the brain -- areas associated with abstract thinking through language. And their performance accuracy correlated with the degree of activation in some of these language areas.

To their astonishment, however, this was not at all the case for boys. In boys, accurate performance depended -- when reading words -- on how hard visual areas of the brain worked. In hearing words, boys' performance depended on how hard auditory areas of the brain worked.

If that pattern extends to language processing that occurs in the classroom, it could inform teaching and testing methods.

Given boys' sensory approach, boys might be more effectively evaluated on knowledge gained from lectures via oral tests and on knowledge gained by reading via written tests. For girls, whose language processing appears more abstract in approach, these different testing methods would appear unnecessary.

"One possibility is that boys have some kind of bottleneck in their sensory processes that can hold up visual or auditory information and keep it from being fed into the language areas of the brain," Burman said. This could result simply from girls developing faster than boys, in which case the differences between the sexes might disappear by adulthood.

Or, an alternative explanation is that boys create visual and auditory associations such that meanings associated with a word are brought to mind simply from seeing or hearing the word.

While the second explanation puts males at a disadvantage in more abstract language function, those kinds of sensory associations may have provided an evolutionary advantage for primitive men whose survival required them to quickly recognize danger-associated sights and sounds.

If the pattern of females relying on an abstract language network and of males relying on sensory areas of the brain extends into adulthood -- a still unresolved question -- it could explain why women often provide more context and abstract representation than men.

Ask a woman for directions and you may hear something like: "Turn left on Main Street, go one block past the drug store, and then turn right, where there's a flower shop on one corner and a cafe across the street."

Such information-laden directions may be helpful for women because all information is relevant to the abstract concept of where to turn; however, men may require only one cue and be distracted by additional information.

Burman is primary author of "Sex Differences in Neural Processing of Language Among Children." Co-authored by James R. Booth (Northwestern University) and Tali Bitan (University of Haifa), the article will be published in the March issue of the journal Neuropsychologia and now is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021.

Adapted from materials provided by Northwestern University, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biology; boys; brains; gender; girls; obvious; sexdifferences
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: sono

You say Deloris, I say....


41 posted on 03/05/2008 3:03:19 PM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
If I said all men are taller than all women, that would be obvious hogwash.

If I said on average men are a little taller than women, that would be the plain truth.

What you quoted from the original article:

Boys And Girls Brains Are Different: Gender Differences In Language Appear Biological
could be read either way ... it's ambiguous.

When someone comes away from a statement that has two possible readings, one hogwash and one common truth, complaining of hogwash, then others observing this can only wonder why that someone only saw the hogwash.

Do you raise hogs for a living? Just asking.

42 posted on 03/05/2008 3:07:17 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Anyone that has observed a classroom knows that boys and girls learn differently. Genetics would be the reason.

Teachers who realize this have happy students. Those who still believe a “one size fits all” approach have unhappy students.


43 posted on 03/05/2008 3:21:41 PM PST by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
Are you suggesting men give any more reliable directions?

My impression is that most people, unless they have some job or circumstance that routinely presents them with requests for direction such as gas station attendent, hotel clerk, or rental car agent, will give rather unreliable directions in response to unexpected requests.

What I do notice that's different between directions from men and women is somewhat different than what this quote from the article suggests. I hear women give more landmarks and visual details ("turn at the post office, across from the shoe store"), and men give more directions and distances ("north on I35 for five miles, then east on Smith Road.")

Similarly, men do better getting to a strange location using a map; women do better hearing someone tell them what they'll be seeing, as they travel there.

When I'm traveling, if I loose my orientation, then I'm lost. When my wife is traveling, so long as she sees something familiar, she'll get there.

44 posted on 03/05/2008 3:21:45 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blam

Wow! We have known this for years, but scientists were afraid to say anything for fear of the fierce wrath of feminazis.


45 posted on 03/05/2008 3:30:12 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Free Speech: a fairy tale about something that existed in the USA a long time ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

You know your a geek when you recognize Maxwell’s equations on a naked chicks back.


46 posted on 03/05/2008 3:49:47 PM PST by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam

Must be a good thing. It keeps the species going!


47 posted on 03/05/2008 4:16:22 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
"You know your a geek when you recognize Maxwell’s equations on a naked chicks back."

You're.

48 posted on 03/05/2008 4:19:08 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
This article about the elite of the elite was very interesting. Most work in this world, though, does not need to be done, nor is it done, by the elite of the elite.

I have an expression that I used frequently with my homeschooled kids: “You don’t have to be Mr. Atlas to lift a 10 lb. bag of sugar.” This is true for most professions in this world. You don’t have to be the elite of the elite to do most of the work that needs to be done in this world, you just need to be smart enough.

While there are likely biological differences between men and women in mathematics, those differences are probably not enough to keep women from most professions requiring skill in mathematics. Just as with the 10 lb. bag of sugar, all that is needed is to be smart enough, motivated, and committed to hard work.

By the way, my homeschooled daughters graduated at the ages of 18 with B.S degrees in mathematics from a state university. The older of the two won a university level mathematics competition. (As a prize the math department gave her “Ski Mt.Snow” tee-shirt.) This young woman recently earned a masters in mathematics at the age of 20. The girls are both married now, and are not pursuing further education in the field of mathematics. The older is very interested in finance, and the younger is studying chemical engineering.

I attended Villanova University soon after it had gone co-ed. I was often the only woman in my science classes. I routinely scored highest in the class in calculus, differential equations, numerical analysis, engineering physics, and chemistry major’s chemistry. I am certainly not among the elite of the elite, but I was, and am, capable of doing almost anything in any field that requires strong understanding of mathematics. I am smart enough to lift a 10 lb. bag of “mathematics”. ( and so are my girls!) :-)

49 posted on 03/05/2008 4:21:36 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Are there more male or female authors?

What female author can be compared to Shakespeare? Ernest Hemingway? Robert Frost? John Grisham? James Patterson? Robert Parker?

Thus... the term hogwash when it comes to comparing verbal skills of boys and girls.

Jane Austen is terrific at *Bonnet Books* ...Mary Higgins Clark --> lightweight mysteries ...Daniel Steele -- gag me with a spoon romance BS

Realize I've left many authors out... but this is a chat board.

50 posted on 03/05/2008 4:24:28 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: metmom
The evidence is in. On average, both homeschooled boys and girls do far better than government schooled boys and girls in math. :-)
51 posted on 03/05/2008 4:25:38 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
You're not making much sense to me. Exactly what is it that you find that is hogwash about the original article?

When I responded to your earlier post, I thought you were stating that the article found differences between men and women's verbal skills, and I thought you were saying that was hogwash ... meaning you thought the article said there was a basic difference between men and women, and you disagreed.

But in your latest reply, you obviously find that there are differences, and give good examples of such.

Color me confused.

Please remember, if you respond, that sarcasm and cynicism aren't always obvious on the internet between strangers, so if you choose to use such, it is done so at an increased risk of being misunderstood.

52 posted on 03/05/2008 4:45:13 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sono
Larry Summers was fired as Harvard President for similar heresy.

Because he made female professors cry and feel faint at telling them that men and women are different.

53 posted on 03/05/2008 5:41:13 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
OK I solved all the equations.

The answers are on the other side

Could you post it now, so I can see how I did?

54 posted on 03/05/2008 5:43:00 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Watch it suckas!!! Larry Summers, President, Harvard University, was outed by the female faculty for saying that males are better at math and science. As a female who held her own and bested many males at math and science, this is hogwash... I think intelligence is an individual gift.

I think you need to review statistics (math and science). :)

55 posted on 03/05/2008 5:43:06 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
We are all women—there are just a few with penises that don’t know it yet.

I think even the densest of women would notice if they had a penis.

56 posted on 03/05/2008 6:06:19 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

LOL.

I’ll ask my wife if she remembered to make a doctor’s appointment.

She will answer that the garbage men ran late today.

She is perfectly confident that she answered my question.

Or she will start a conversation with, “We need a blue one.” I’m left wondering what the heck the topic is.

I had a woman ask me in front of a committee if it was possible to get two women to agree on anything. I responded I didn’t think it was possible to get one of them to agree on anything.


57 posted on 03/05/2008 6:16:38 PM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

I learned, to my surprise, that math is really not hard. It has certain rules about what you can and cannot do with numbers. You follow the rules and it works.


58 posted on 03/05/2008 6:21:11 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

LOL ;-P


59 posted on 03/05/2008 6:44:46 PM PST by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Roger that! We are different cohabitants of the planet.
60 posted on 03/05/2008 6:54:17 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson