Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBattman
It's also worthwhile checking out the discussion over at arliners.net:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/military/

More technical discussion there, as expected for an aviation enthusiasts' forum.

The view from EADS: http://www.eadstankerupdate.com/images/2007/sep_03_07/sep_03_1.pdf

This data seems to corroborate what analysts say: That the A330 MRTT / KC45 has a significant advantage when it comes to fuel load at a 1000nm or even 2000nm range.
51 posted on 03/05/2008 7:36:01 PM PST by wolf78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: wolf78
That the A330 MRTT / KC45 has a significant advantage when it comes to fuel load at a 1000nm or even 2000nm range.

Wrong emphasis: "superior" at a 1000, "substantially superior" at 2000, The KC-45A gets better the further is goes out.

53 posted on 03/05/2008 7:54:55 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Never say yer sorry, mister. It's a sign of weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson