Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letters Suggest Lincoln Wanted to Buy Slaves for $400 Apiece in 'Gradual Emancipation'
Fox News ^

Posted on 03/05/2008 11:23:56 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Letters Suggest Lincoln Wanted to Buy Slaves for $400 Apiece in 'Gradual Emancipation'

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

AP

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Barely a year into the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suggested buying slaves for $400 apiece under a "gradual emancipation" plan that would bring peace at less cost than several months of hostilities.

The proposal was outlined in one of 72 letters penned by Lincoln that ended up in the University of Rochester's archives. The correspondence was digitally scanned and posted online along with easier-to-read transcriptions.

Accompanying them are 215 letters sent to Lincoln by dozens of fellow political and military leaders. They include letters from Vice President Andrew Johnson and Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, who both succeeded Lincoln in the presidency in the 12 years after his assassination in 1865.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abelincoln; emancipation; letters; presidents; slavery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Swiss

That is an interesting observation about the Chinese. They are number 1 is so many areas that America used to be. China in my eyes resembles an older America a lot. They are the #1 ship builder, #1 user of steel and concrete. Their highway plan is basically a copy of ours, with slight improvements. When its complete it will be a much larger system. They don’t have silly notions about limiting their power. If america wanted to, we could synthesize enough fuel from coal to help protect us in cases of war and to keep money within our own borders. The Chinese already are currently building plants that will make over 400 million barrels of fuel/year from coal. They exploit nuclear power. They negotiate for intellectual rights as often as possible. They look after themselves and what is in their national interests. Our country oth seems to say “sorry” all the time for being rich and powerful.


81 posted on 03/05/2008 4:31:33 PM PST by Zachy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Zachy

That is exactly what I am saying.

The Chinese is believing in Manifest Destiny
Americans are ashamed of Manifest Destiny


82 posted on 03/05/2008 4:46:07 PM PST by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Zachy

> IIRC God sent Moses to Egypt to free some slaves. I don’t remember any offers of compensation either. Just a random thought that came to mind.

Funny you should mention Moses: on that occasion the slaves exacted their own compensation by “borrowing” lots of loot from their Egyptian masters en route from Egypt as they were departing.

See Exodus 12:36 “...And the LORD gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they lent unto them such things as they required. And they spoiled the Egyptians.”

(That would be where all the gold and treasure came from when building the Ark and the Tabernacle)


83 posted on 03/06/2008 10:00:27 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion; snuffy smiff; slow5poh; EdReform; TheZMan; Texas Mulerider; Oorang; ...

Dixieping


84 posted on 03/06/2008 10:02:33 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Lincoln was a very, very shrewd man. Not the most popular guy down here, and some of the things he set in motion have largely destroyed our federalist system of government because of unintended consequences, but there’s no denying he was extremely astute politically, and willing to let nothing stand in his way of reuniting the Union—including, in a few cases, the Constitution.

}:-)4


85 posted on 03/06/2008 10:19:32 AM PST by Moose4 (Hey GOP...don't move toward the middle. Move the middle toward us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Zachy
BTW, I too live in Illinois, but don’t see many bumper stickers like the ones you do. Do you live in the southern part of the state?

Southern Illinois was quite different culturally from the Chicago area at the time of the war. May still be for all I know. In contrast to much of the rest of the state, Chicago was essentially a sanctuary city for escaped slaves prior to the war.

When a few fugitive slaves were caught in Chicago in early April 1861, they were quickly taken out of the city for hearings in Springfield before a magistrate friend of Lincoln's. He shipped the captured fugitives back to their owners in Missouri. Whereupon, one thousand fugitive slaves living in Chicago left en masse for Canada. Apparently, they realized the new administration was going to apply the fugitive slave law even in the sanctuary city of Chicago.

86 posted on 03/06/2008 11:55:15 AM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Lincoln was offering $400 for slaves? The average slave price in the Deep South from 1856 to 1860 was $1,658. Source: Link.

I found the following prices in the January 29, 1850 State Gazette of Austin, Texas:

- Clinton, Georgia. 60 negroes sold, all field hands young and old included. Average price $905

- Hawkinsville, Georgia. Three male field hands sold for $1,380 to $1,510 apiece.

- Columbus, Georgia. Prices ranged from a low of $875 for one field hand to $2,010 for a blacksmith. Most field hands sold for about $1,500.

Perhaps slave prices were lower in the northern states that Lincoln's proposal covered.

87 posted on 03/06/2008 1:13:33 PM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rustbucket
Typo. January 29, 1850 State Gazette = January 29, 1859 State Gazette

That issue of the State Gazette also included a sale of 17 slaves for an average price of $707. This sale included seven infants and children. Clearly children and infants brought lower prices.

88 posted on 03/06/2008 1:29:07 PM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Zachy

No. It can be said that they were sick of Northern Sh*t, and got the hell out. Lincoln was a good reason to leave.


89 posted on 03/06/2008 1:39:30 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This is covered in some detail in Shelby Foote's “Civil War Volume 1”. (I am listening to the AudioBook version, and am enjoying it greatly). He published a letter in response to a Horace Greely Editorial immediately before the Emancipation Proclamation that stated quite clearly and forcefully that his primary intent was to save the Union. If he had to leave slavery in place, or free all slaves, or free only some to save the Union, He would do so.

And yes, Lincoln understood that by issuing the Proclamation, it made it impossible for both France and England to recognize the South, for that would require that they recognize slavery. It also killed developing efforts by England and France to assist in negotiations between North and South to end the war

After the Proclamation was issued, and the abolitionists attacked him for not freeing all slaves, he said that the issue of the slavery in loyal States would be resolved (perhaps by purchase) after the fighting was over.

Some of the commenters on this thread would profit from reading or listening to Foote's work.

90 posted on 03/06/2008 2:26:10 PM PST by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Legal and moral are not the same

At the time of the American Revolution, 1776; every colony legally had slaves in it. It was not considered immoral but by a very few. I wonder if in the future will people talk about pro life people as morally bankrupt since that issue is running a reverse enlightening.
91 posted on 03/07/2008 5:32:05 AM PST by smug (smug for President; Your only real hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Can't cite a source, but I vaguely recall reading somewhere that when the South seceded, Lincoln's plan was to adopt a "wait and see" approach but the attack on Ft. Sumter forced his hand.

Lincoln ingeniously devised a plan that would cause the Confederates to fire the first shot and thus, he hoped, inspire the states that had not yet seceded to unite in the effort to restore the Union. http://www.us-civilwar.com/sumter.htm

This a very complicated history with back channel negotitations, unofficial emissaries, lies, and back stabbing---very interesting reading, but most of it is not covered in the link above. A real eye opener of the Lincoln administration
92 posted on 03/07/2008 6:03:43 AM PST by smug (smug for President; Your only real hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson