“He is only running because he thinks she is a sure shot to lose, he isn’t going to let himself (actually, his wife won’t let) him be the scapegoat for a losing campaign.”
-—Don’t know if I agree with that being his reason for running, but I know that you’re right about him being the scapegoat. However, he could also be a scapegoat for refusing to lend himself to the campaign. Would he allow that?
“Obama isn’t going to touch a sure loser, and attach his name to is.....and he is only running because he thinks she is a sure loser.”
-—Again, I think you give him more cred than he deserves. He may just have been running to position himself. Nothing unreasonable about that supposition.
“You would find more freepers who could make a better case of why she could win, then you would of his campaign staff.”
-—I guess I don’t know his campaign staff as well as you do. But then, I wouldn’t expect HIS CAMPAIGN STAFF to say ANYTHING positive about her until the campaign is over.
Actually that does surprise me, most of the guys who dropped out, always said positive things about the both of them.
The 2 of them have been unusual in the amount of bile they have spewed about each other, its like Al Gore and Mike Dukakis in 1988 (and we remembered the end result of that).
One thing to thank gore for......willie horton.