[gridlock]

People are talking about Mrs. Clinton’s “Math Problem”, that she cannot win enough delegates to clinch even if she wins the remaining contests by 60%+. But doesn’t the same problem also exist for Obama? He is not so far ahead that he will have enough to clinch either.

The media echo chamber is concentrating on Mrs. Clinton not having enough to win without superdelegates, but the exact same thing is true of Obama, and nobody is talking about that.

[freedomwarrior998]

People are talking about Mrs. Clinton’s “Math Problem”, that she cannot win enough delegates to clinch even if she wins the remaining contests by 60%+. But doesn’t the same problem also exist for Obama? He is not so far ahead that he will have enough to clinch either.

The media echo chamber is concentrating on Mrs. Clinton not having enough to win without superdelegates, but the exact same thing is true of Obama, and nobody is talking about that.

Obama needs far less of the Superdelegates than the beast does. He'll get em.

[SouthTexas]

And that was the whole intent of keeping the rats going.

I could not do that though. Didn't want "dim" stamped on my card for the next year!

[tcrlaf]

“the exact same thing is true of Obama, and nobody is talking about that.”

Many Democrats actually BELIEVE the press releases of thier politcal heros, and believe they would NEVER put thier own enlightened self-interest ahead of the Party...

They are about to get schooled in strong-arm politcking, and I, for one, am going to laugh my ass off...